Dr. Nigam's fraudulent claims about Dr. Gho's work

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • neversaynever
    replied
    I think that photo got used in an attempt to cover up my real name by his secretary, instead of just blurring out my real name! She decided to use one of the most common names too. It's like John Smith. Very very common, facebook it

    I had 1100ish grafts, and I can assure everyone I did not receive grafts from someone elses scalp.

    And yes, i feel no need to contact Dr Gho. I have made clear what I think of HASCI.

    I'm done with this, good luck guys
    Last edited by Winston; 03-30-2013, 05:28 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by didi

    im confused now
    tsssssss - there are a lot more things around the whole story that sound rather "fishy" than confusing.

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by neversaynever

    ... you guys are contacting Gho and discussing it freely on an open forum?? Do you think that's rational? Get a grip....

    Just for the record...

    Yeah, sure, not contacting Dr. Gho, but Dr. Gho should "get a grip" about every bold claim out there "on open forums", sure ...
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • didi
    replied
    im confused now

    how many nigam-grafts did nsn receive?2000 doubled to 4000 or?

    Leave a comment:


  • neversaynever
    replied
    Originally posted by didi
    NVN
    Good to hear from you
    How is your donor, any regrowth, are you monitoring the area/taking pix?
    I was going to update with photos (and the news isnt 100% positive thus far) but tell why I should given the attitude of this thread and some people in it?

    If that were my real name you guys are contacting Gho and discussing it freely on an open forum?? Do you think that's rational? Get a grip....

    I will state only this about Gho and HST. I do not see scars or white dots. Hairless gaps were probably there before my hst, and maybe one or two new ones.

    I had a labour intensive, uncomfortable HST session with huge swelling. I also stated that no clinic has a 100% perfect record and given other peoples HST experiences it just seems im one of those oddballs who didnt have it so easy. Ive also stated that HASCI is for real.

    I believe its wrong for Dr Nigam to speak nagatively of HASCI in a professional light and I believe he should retract certain statements.

    The baldtruth moderators need to step in and keep things rational here, because some of you devolving into mud.

    Leave a comment:


  • didi
    replied
    NVN
    Good to hear from you
    How is your donor, any regrowth, are you monitoring the area/taking pix?

    Leave a comment:


  • Kirby_
    replied
    Originally posted by aim4hair
    Dr. Nigam is spending more time trying to bash Gho than trying to prove his techniques.
    Well, yes, that does seem to be the case.

    Leave a comment:


  • didi
    replied
    Iron man needs brain transplant

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    LOL, don't pay any attention to IM, mate, he's always grumpy and just likes to insult anyone who disagrees with him.
    Actually, not really. Just when someone is talking bullshit out of his ass and without any proof - or intentionally is misleading people - like Dr. Nigam.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boldy
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Interessant. Ben je ergens aan het afstuderen ofzo ? Of werk je in deze sector ?
    je kan me het beste pmmen via HLH, omdat ik denk dat de admin hier ons NL gesprek niet leuk gaat vinden.

    Ik ben een Universiteit student (IT), maar mijn hairloss research wat ik er naast doe is zonder te twijfel zwaarder dan me IT opleiding. Ik had altijd al zeer grote affiniteit met techniek, maar dat is sinds een paar jaar omgeslagen naar Micro biologie, en met name cell culture vind ik zeer boeiend. Hiermee ben ik ook overtuigd mijn nw0 terug te krijgen.


    Wat je net zei over deze DR. is zeker niet positief. wat ik ook zeker in me achterhoofd zal houden. Maar als hij dp culture kan en wil doen volgens de instructies. Dan ben ik de gelukkigste man op aarde .

    Ik raad je sterk aan (als je het interessant vindt, om de topic + de studies eens door te nemen.


    Verder, als je contact wil houden, je weet met te vinden via HLH

    groetjes!


    Sorry for the Netherlands Guys.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by Boldy
    well, I guess I'm overexcited about the cure . (DP culture). http://www.hairlosshelp.com/forums/c...es.cfm?catid=7

    I have left my comment about how I think about it, its not the way to go

    I wont disturb you anymore on what you are good at ( humiliating people).
    LOL, don't pay any attention to IM, mate, he's always grumpy and just likes to insult anyone who disagrees with him.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boldy
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    Sorry, but "hairdoubeling" is NOT the threads topic.
    well, I guess I'm overexcited about the cure . (DP culture). http://www.hairlosshelp.com/forums/c...es.cfm?catid=7

    I have left my comment about how I think about it, its not the way to go

    I wont disturb you anymore on what you are good at ( humiliating people).

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by Boldy
    hmm Okey. well I do believe you that's deff not the way to go indeed ..

    Ontopic, regarding the new current hairdoubeling. lets say if both parts of the graft can sucesfully recreate a new hairfolicle, that would be nice.

    I have a study in my archive that show the dermal papulla (bottom part) and the dermal sheeth part both can recreate a new hair once implanted back in vivo.

    On humans and mice. so if this is done proparley, its nice. However, not what I'm currently interested at.


    Im studying the dermal papilla for the past 3 months, and found several ways to expand them massively.

    here are the studies and some background info about it.




    I'm not sure if this is possible in India (due to regulations) but if someone can apply this theory, than it would be great.
    Interessant. Ben je ergens aan het afstuderen ofzo ? Of werk je in deze sector ?

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Boldy

    On topic, regarding the new current hairdoubeling.
    Sorry, but "hairdoubeling" is NOT the threads topic.

    Or do you have something to add to the real topic in this thread?
    I guess - no. Because this thread is all about Dr. Nigam's fraudulent claims about Dr. Gho's work.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boldy
    replied
    hmm Okey. well I do believe you that's deff not the way to go indeed ..

    Ontopic, regarding the new current hairdoubeling. lets say if both parts of the graft can sucesfully recreate a new hairfolicle, that would be nice.

    I have a study in my archive that show the dermal papulla (bottom part) and the dermal sheeth part both can recreate a new hair once implanted back in vivo.

    On humans and mice. so if this is done proparley, its nice. However, not what I'm currently interested at.


    Im studying the dermal papilla for the past 3 months, and found several ways to expand them massively.

    here are the studies and some background info about it.




    I'm not sure if this is possible in India (due to regulations) but if someone can apply this theory, than it would be great.

    Leave a comment:

Working...