Misleading Claims about Dr. Gho's HST technique...

[Arashi]

Me troll? How so arashi... you as self proclaimed fanboy have no idea what you beleive in and you cant explain anything in regards to hst and you still a fanboy?

At least IM had some silly theories and said they were all 'TELOGEN' hairs, later on he changed that opinion...

By now you should know its all smoke and mirrors...

Haha, you're such a funny girl Didi. I'm no expert at this field of medicine, I never claimed I was. The problem is when you start to think you are, like you do, then you'll come up with crazy theories because you basically have no idea what you're talking about.

The reason I "believe" in Gho is that he's written academic papers, which got published in scientific peer reviewed magazines like the British Journal of Dermatology. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to get research published there ? Articles get reviewed there by a board of academic reviewers and they won't publish the kind of nonsense like Dr Nigams posts here on these boards for sure.

Furthermore we've seen in several cases like GC's case that regrowth happens. No, we don't know an exact number but I'm confident we'll see at least 50% which is good enough for me. I'm hoping for more of course, maybe we'll even get close to the 80% HASCI themselves claim, who knows. But 50% will be enough to motivate me to do 3 Gho procedures in the coming years (I had one last year, will have one this year and one in the years after). But again, I think the regrowth number will be close to 80% than to 50%, otherwise I think HASCI wouldn't be willing to participate in this test.

Anyway, we'll soon know the final regrowth number from wednesday's upcoming test. And I'm sure you'll be claiming that it's all fake and what's more but you have been given the chance to witness everything yourself, or send somebody you trust. I'm sure you're not going to do that so I don't care anyway what you think or claim. But to me it means there's only 1 fanboy out here, not interested in ANY proof at all and that's you. You're just hear to bash Gho, hail Nigams and you're not even interested in getting any procedure yourself. I ask myself, what's somebody like that even doing here ?

[Arashi]

"The British Journal of Dermatology is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal that covers the field of dermatology. It is published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the British Association of Dermatologists. "

A scientific magazine reviewed by and made for (academic) dermatologists. And you seriously think they'd publish some 'hocus pocus fairytale' ? You think they'd publish something they have ANY doubts it might be BS ?

So, yeah, that's pretty good enough for me. Once Dr Nigams gets an article published there, I'd might reconsider my opinion regarding him. But I have NO doubts that he'll NEVER get something published anyway. Even NeverSayNever, who visited him, concluded shortly thereafter: "Dr Nigams is NOT a scientist".

But your problem is you don't care about that all. You think you're smarter than these scientists, you (think you) see some stuff in a petridish and conclude that all this is must all just be BS. And you don't even care to ask HASCI themselves to explain the stupidity of your theory to you. So what other conclusion is there to be drawn that you're just a troll ? So, good for you Didi. Enjoy it.

[NeedHairASAP]

"The British Journal of Dermatology is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal that covers the field of dermatology. It is published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the British Association of Dermatologists. "

A scientific magazine reviewed by and made for (academic) dermatologists. And you seriously think they'd publish some 'hocus pocus fairytale' ? You think they'd publish something they have ANY doubts it might be BS ?

So, yeah, that's pretty good enough for me. Once Dr Nigams gets an article published there, I'd might reconsider my opinion regarding him. But I have NO doubts that he'll NEVER get something published anyway. Even NeverSayNever, who visited him, concluded shortly thereafter: "Dr Nigams is NOT a scientist".

But your problem is you don't care about that all. You think you're smarter than these scientists, you (think you) see some stuff in a petridish and conclude that all this is must all just be BS. And you don't even care to ask HASCI themselves to explain the stupidity of your theory to you. So what other conclusion is there to be drawn that you're just a troll ? So, good for you Didi. Enjoy it.

Didi is a troll. confirmed.

[didi]

The reason I "believe" in Gho is that he's written academic papers, which got published in scientific peer reviewed magazines like the British Journal of Dermatology. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to get research published there ?


If you listen to Spencer Kobren he said it explicitly in relation to publishing of these papers that it doesnt ot mean sh1t, he said anybody can can publish it and some of these papars are good, as in they have value and other are garbage..Spencers words

I will try to find the show where he said it


Calling someone a troll doesnt mean much...So is Spencer a troll ??

HASCI fans are so naive and gullible..confirmed

[greatjob!]

Every time I log onto this site it cracks me up how much time some of you guys spend endlessly defending doctors who don't know and/or care you even exist. You guys are like grown up, bald Bieber fans, lol

[Arashi]

If you listen to Spencer Kobren he said it explicitly in relation to publishing of these papers that it doesnt ot mean sh1t, he said anybody can can publish it and some of these papars are good, as in they have value and other are garbage..Spencers words[
I will try to find the show where he said it

Now you point me to that quote and I will eat my shoes and videotape it while doing that if he says that anybody can publish an article in the british journal of Dermatology. However if you can NOT show me that quote, then YOU must eat your shoes and videotape it and post it here ok ? Haha. Come on Didi, you know better than that, you troll.

[Arashi]

Every time I log onto this site it cracks me up how much time some of you guys spend endlessly defending doctors who don't know and/or care you even exist. You guys are like grown up, bald Bieber fans, lol

Sad thing is, you're totally right. I've said a few times I would stop reacting to Didi but somehow I still do it. It's sad. But I'm improving and haven't reacted to most of the stuff he said anymore

[greatjob!]

Sad thing is, you're totally right. I've said a few times I would stop reacting to Didi but somehow I still do it. It's sad. But I'm improving and haven't reacted to most of the stuff he said anymore

I wasn't just talking about didi

[Arashi]

I wasn't just talking about didi

Well since you reacted after just another totally useless, meaningless and pointless 'discussion' between me and Didi I figured you were talking about us. But even if you didn't: I feel exactly like the way you described and most of the times I just don't understand why I'm even bothering reacting to this troll. In fact, you know what, I'll just start ignoring him totally again from now on.

Bye Didi

[gc83uk]

I wasn't just talking about didi

Well everybody else here talking about Gho has either been treated by him or will be, so I don't understand your previous comment.

When you spend thousands and document your procedure hoping to help others and 'The Troll', which I will now refer to him as disputes all aspects of Gho, then it's natural to respond.

[NeedHairASAP]

The reason I "believe" in Gho is that he's written academic papers, which got published in scientific peer reviewed magazines like the British Journal of Dermatology. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to get research published there ?


If you listen to Spencer Kobren he said it explicitly in relation to publishing of these papers that it doesnt ot mean sh1t, he said anybody can can publish it and some of these papars are good, as in they have value and other are garbage..Spencers words

I will try to find the show where he said it


Calling someone a troll doesnt mean much...So is Spencer a troll ??

HASCI fans are so naive and gullible..confirmed

Give up guys. You're dealing with somebody who thinks "spencer said it" is a citation.


didi: this is the way the world is

others: why?

didi: spencer said it was

others: oh.....

[Arashi]

Give up guys. You're dealing with somebody who thinks "spencer said it" is a citation.


didi: this is the way the world is

others: why?

didi: spencer said it was

others: oh.....

But still the thing is, Spencer NEVER said that anybody can publish an article in the British journal of dermatology. He's not a complete idiot. Unlike Didi.

It's just one of those things Didi makes up. And for what ? It just makes him look like a fool since it's just the dumbest statement ever.

[didi]

But still the thing is, Spencer NEVER said that anybody can publish an article in the British journal of dermatology. He's not a complete idiot. Unlike Didi.

It's just one of those things Didi makes up. And for what ? It just makes him look like a fool since it's just the dumbest statement ever.

How do you know Spencer didnt say it?
So you basically saying Spencer is fool if he actually said it?

[Arashi]

So you basically saying Spencer is fool if he actually said it?

Exactly. If he says anybody can have an article published in an academic, peer reviewed magazine like this one, he'd be a fool. I'm an academic myself and know how these academic magazines work. You send them your article and they review it. Or they ask you to do an article, because you've proven yourself to be knowledgeable and valuable to that specific academic community. But even then, if you mail them some Donald Duck & Mickey Mouse story, I'm sure they won't publish it, even if you wrote the article after an invitation to do so.

But I'm pretty sure Spencer isn't a fool, so I'm also pretty sure he hasn't said something stupid like this.

[Arashi]

Having a hard time finding that quote eh, Didi

You see, when you're writing your final thesis to graduate from an academic study, a lot of times a part of your research will consist out of doing a literature study, in which a lot of times you'll be using and referring to articles from peer reviewed academic magazines like this one. That's just one of the reasons it's of uttermost importance that the published articles aren't Donald Duck & Mickey Mouse stories.