The 50 Graft Test Procedure

[JJJJrS]

By looking at that petridish I think you are going to be right. Way too many 'telogen' in the 1's section.

Now imagine if we didn't take this into account and how distorted the regeneration rate would have turned out.

[Arashi]

When someone counts the number of hairs from the '1' subsection, it will be more than obvious that they are not just hairs in telogen.

By looking at that petridish I think you are going to be right. Way too many 'telogen' in the 1's section.

[JJJJrS]

I cannot accept these are all because of telogen.

I would actually rather believe they are transections that didn't fit into the drill and the transected hairs will regrow in the donor as normal.

Surely this is what's happening here!

When someone counts the number of hairs from the '1' subsection, it will be more than obvious that they are not just hairs in telogen.

[Arashi]

I cannot accept these are all because of telogen.

I would actually rather believe they are transections that didn't fit into the drill and the transected hairs will regrow in the donor as normal.

Surely this is what's happening here!

That certainly is a possibility. But then again, according to that article 10% should be in telogen and that's pretty consistent with our find (HASCI counted 2x50 = 100, we're at 110-ish)

[gc83uk]

I cannot accept these are all because of telogen.

I would actually rather believe they are transections that didn't fit into the drill and the transected hairs will regrow in the donor as normal.

Surely this is what's happening here!