GCs donor pic 24 days after 3000 grafts-donor density

[Arashi]

At 85% regeneration and 3000 grafts he should have lost 450 grafts. Picture looks like that just could be right, doesn't it ?

[didi]

Im actually surprised by this picture and how bad harvested area looks compared to non harvested. GC has been told by other FUE clinics that he can have 2000 FUE grafts, that would mean he could have 10 000 HST grafts before he really lose 2000 in donor(20&#37...BUT I cant imagine him having another 7 000 grafts taken out of donor area, it already looks like he needs to stop taking grafts around his ears, I dont know what his donor area at the back look like, but sides are done or almost done.


GC
Can you put up some good quality photos of your sides(at right 90 degree angle so we can make better comparison of hrvested and non harvesrted areas) and back buzzed
to zero.

Are we waiting for more regeneration to occur or what we see in day-24 is about it?

[Jairus]

As you can see theres difference in density of hair on the left side of pic where grafts were taken from and density to the right where theres no grafts taken

I cant see 'scars' but its obvious that harvested area looks depleted compared to non harvested area.


this picture is taken on day 24 of last procedure;
3000 grafts extracted;

if we know that most hairs already regenerated as they regenerate within first 2-3 weeks then its safe to say that harvested area wont get any or much thicker....

Looking at that picture you can clearly see difference in denisty, look at spacing and big gaps,


The problem is permanent safe area is so small like IM said 2.5 cm x 27 cm its about 70 cm2 area...4900 follicular units grows there, now you take 3000 out of there with 80% regeneration, 20% dont regenerate at all, 40% regrow as thinner or with less hairs then you get what we see in the photo

Cheers for this - glad some evidence is coming out that proves Gho is NOT all encompassing. There are downsides like everything else in particular thin donor regeneration.

[Kiwi]

Still... It's the best FUE in town!!!

[didi]

As you can see theres difference in density of hair on the left side of pic where grafts were taken from and density to the right where theres no grafts taken

I cant see 'scars' but its obvious that harvested area looks depleted compared to non harvested area.


this picture is taken on day 24 of last procedure;
3000 grafts extracted;

if we know that most hairs already regenerated as they regenerate within first 2-3 weeks then its safe to say that harvested area wont get any or much thicker....

Looking at that picture you can clearly see difference in denisty, look at spacing and big gaps,


The problem is permanent safe area is so small like IM said 2.5 cm x 27 cm its about 70 cm2 area...4900 follicular units grows there, now you take 3000 out of there with 80% regeneration, 20% dont regenerate at all, 40% regrow as thinner or with less hairs then you get what we see in the photo