Gho age restrictions?

[FearTheLoss]

I think you can get all the information you need from gc's existing photos

The day 24 photo from the 3rd procedure shows the donor at grade 0.

Thanks bro I didn't see that...but it does look slightly depleted..hard to tell because of the flash....it would be nice to see a pic at a further distance of the whole back of the head shaven to see if it's noticeable he's had surgery

[J_B_Davis]

Thanks bro I didn't see that...but it does look slightly depleted..hard to tell because of the flash....it would be nice to see a pic at a further distance of the whole back of the head shaven to see if it's noticeable he's had surgery

If I'm being honest, if this guy gets a little bit of a tan, all of those white dots are going to show up. It is really good FUE, but I can see that the donor is depleted with white dot scaring even on his very pale skin. By no means does this look bad at all, it looks extremely good to me, but there is scaring. It's plain as day. His skin hides the tiny scars very well. He probably could shave down and still look almost perfect if he doesn't go in the sun.

[didi]

If I'm being honest, if this guy gets a little bit of a tan, all of those white dots are going to show up. It is really good FUE, but I can see that the donor is depleted with white dot scaring even on his very pale skin. By no means does this look bad at all, it looks extremely good to me, but there is scaring. It's plain as day. His skin hides the tiny scars very well. He probably could shave down and still look almost perfect if he doesn't go in the sun.

it looks slig***y depleted, theres no way GC could have another 3000 without looking very depleted

GC can you take pix of your entire head but from 1m, 2m distance...shaven down to 0 guard..


Im thinking this could be the main reason why dutch singer Dean Saunders stopped getting more HSTs, his donor just couldnt take it anymore..its been year and a half since he had HST

[534623]

By no means does this look bad at all, it looks extremely good to me, but there is scaring. It's plain as day. His skin hides the tiny scars very well. He probably could shave down and still look almost perfect if he doesn't go in the sun.

Really - there is scarring? I think that's rather something what guys like WANT to see...

Anyway - here are close-ups of 5 different photos and taken at different times and, of course, with different (flash)colors...

For example #6, which did not regenerate in the 2nd procedure in the same area, can you see any typical FUE scarring? I can not. But I'm pretty sure - you can.

[didi]

scarring is not right word,

but there are gaps, not typical FUE white dots

Question is: Will this 'gaps' between hairs tan if GC gets exposed to sun and make them more like a white dots?

It would be interesting to see black indian man getting 6000 HST grafts, (not Afro with curly hair)

[Vox]

scarring is not right word,

but there are gaps, not typical FUE white dots

Definitely I cannot see the typical FUE scarring in the photo posted. It would help though to see a couple of photos of the same area under different lighting conditions.

The gaps may be due to partial regeneration (about 81% in gc83uk's case, if I remember well) or to his particular alopecia condition; or both.

[J_B_Davis]

Definitely I cannot see the typical FUE scarring in the photo posted. It would help though to see a couple of photos of the same area under different lighting conditions.

The gaps may be due to partial regeneration (about 81% in gc83uk's case, if I remember well) or to his particular alopecia condition; or both.

I'm going to have to respectfully disagree. there is clearly visible scaring in those pictures and if this guy gets a good suntan on his head those tiny white dots will become much more apparent. the scars do seem smaller than many of the FUE examples that I've seen, but I've seen some some similar type of scaring from Dr. Cole and Dr. Bisanga , and their end results are far superior than anything coming from Gho.

You guys keep throwing around unverifiable "regeneration" numbers, but no body knows how much if anything is "regenerating", so I find it a little silly to keep putting this information out there when it can't be verified through a hair loss forum. What can be verified is the Gho seems to be doing small session FUE with limited results, but extremely good scaring and there is nothing wrong with that.

[534623]

there is nothing wrong with that.

I think there is a lot wrong with you. The question is - what exactly is wrong with you - let me guess ...

[J_B_Davis]

I think there is a lot wrong with you. The question is - what exactly is wrong with you - let me guess ...

Enough with the childish insults Ironman. Why can't we just have a mature discussion about this topic?

[didi]

When you look at day 24 photo you can clearly see depleted area above the birthmark and to the right and you can see where untouched area starts...and GC lost only about 600 FUs in donor....

no bad for 3000 grafts BUT getting another 2000 and it will be very very hard to pull off shaved look

[clarence]

I'm going to have to respectfully disagree. there is clearly visible scaring in those pictures and if this guy gets a good suntan on his head those tiny white dots will

What the ****!!? Which ones??

[FearTheLoss]

What the ****!!? Which ones??

agreed, I don't see any scaring what so ever.

[hellouser]

agreed, I don't see any scaring what so ever.

Neither do I. To me it looks a little bare but its only because those are grafts, not hairs which most of them will be 2-3 hairs per graft so the photo is deceiving (in a way).

[534623]

agreed, I don't see any scaring what so ever.

Don’t wonder, because this is normal. I mean, it is normal that they can see scarring (even there is no scarring) because every HT doc’s dog out there, can see the following every day in the clinic…

This is a normal FUE donor area result a patient posted in another forum. I tried to cover up all the clear visible white dots (it wasn’t really difficult to do this!) and counted the dots…


Indeed, the patient had around just 1000 FUE extractions in his donor area.

And now the simple question (for idiots):
Can you definitely see the same extraction pattern in gc’s after photos – even after 3000 extractions and not just 1000? The guy in the pics above has an even better hair density in his donor area (or should I say “HAD a better density”?) than gc.

So, now let’s compare and look again – gc 24 days after 1600 HST extractions (after 3000 all in all so far)…

http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/12/16/3377048/day%2024%20010.JPG

Oh, wait – you might think “this is unfair” because HT doc’s dogs out there explain that “the white dots don't typically appear until patients are at about 3 to 4 months after surgery”.

Okay, this is an argument on one hand, correct on the other hand. So how about gc’s donor area after 9 month (BEFORE having his 3rd HST)?
Here it is…

http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/3/15/3278666/gc-9month-after.JPG

So now you can compare all the photos.

Why you can’t see the same in gc’s photos?

Here you’ll find the reasons - well analyzed…

http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showthread.php?t=11297

Besides gc’s 1st HST, his 2nd and 3rd HST procedure is extremely well documented – practically even every photo he posted.

By the way, I can very often read in hair transplants hyping forums “This is a patient who came to our clinic for a 2nd or 3rd FUE or FUT procedure”.

But what I find highly comical – seems they never can’t find the digital camera in their clinic when they shave a patients head a 2nd or a 3rd time in their clinic after the patient is already having normal FUE in their clinic. And even if they can find the camera, seems they can’t find the proper place to post these photos. And all this after so many years of FUE. This behaviour is highly suspect…

[534623]

By the way, I can very often read in hair transplants hyping forums “This is a patient who came to our clinic for a 2nd or 3rd FUE or FUT procedure”.

But what I find highly comical – seems they never can’t find the digital camera in their clinic when they shave a patients head a 2nd or a 3rd time in their clinic after the patient is already having normal FUE in their clinic. And even if they can find the camera, seems they can’t find the proper place to post these photos. And all this after so many years of FUE. This behaviour is highly suspect…

By the way - here is such "a" reason, why you guys very very rare can see online good high quality photos of normal FUE procedures, who show you donor areas after NORMAL FUE procedures - I'm talking about SHAVED DOWN photos, and not any fast comb-over photos/videos with longer hairs...

The patient reported THE story in another hairloss forum:
He had a FUE hair transplant and it was told him that he should get around 800 grafts to refine his hairline but "i can count at least 1300 red holes on my nape". In addition he mentioned "I could count only 700 punches at the recipient area". Furthermore, he mentioned "I'm questioning the facts: I paid for 800 grafts, but there's around 1300-1400 holes in my donor area. As you can see it on the picture it is pretty obvious."

But besides all this - can you see WHERE (in which areas) they extracted the grafts? Pfffffft....