i think dr. cole is totally right with his diameter/follicle bisecting statement. it was already raised in another thread that bisected follicles, even if both halves start to grow, the diameter was finer. and all in all, with bisecting follicles the chance for surviving follicles is smaller, and you would end up in less than one total follicle, like dr. cole mentioned.
thus, only if dr. wesley can show donor regeneration with the same diameter than before, then it can be success, otherwise it's doomed to fail. to me, the only advantage of pilofocus is that you don't see any white dots.
but if dr. cole achieves similar results and much better healing properties with acell, then it's a good deal and there's no need to adopt a new surgical instrument. all in all, i don't really have much hopes for pilofocus. the marketing was good though. it was hyped up by some users here so that everybody got excited.
however, i'm looking forward to the donor regeneration test of dr. cole.
if that fails as well, then i think we can all agree that donor regeneration will never ever happen. too many tried and failed already.
thus, only if dr. wesley can show donor regeneration with the same diameter than before, then it can be success, otherwise it's doomed to fail. to me, the only advantage of pilofocus is that you don't see any white dots.
but if dr. cole achieves similar results and much better healing properties with acell, then it's a good deal and there's no need to adopt a new surgical instrument. all in all, i don't really have much hopes for pilofocus. the marketing was good though. it was hyped up by some users here so that everybody got excited.
however, i'm looking forward to the donor regeneration test of dr. cole.
if that fails as well, then i think we can all agree that donor regeneration will never ever happen. too many tried and failed already.
Comment