New Stemcell Treatment Photos... wow?

[bananana]

I just had to point out, Dr. Oz is notorious for plugging all sorts of pseudoscientific garbage. In fact, celebrity doctors in general are the worst when it comes to promoting unproven and sometimes even dangerous treatments. Sadly, the consequences of being associated with flimflam are nowhere near as bad as they should be. People have short memories, and the con artists just move on to the next scam.

I would love for this to be the real deal, but we need to be very skeptical of anything that isn't going through standard three-phase clinical trials.

Ok, so it might be bad analogy as I'm living 10000 miles far from USA and I've never ever watched a single episode of Oz - I just heard about him from women who do watch those kind of shows.

Agreed with you on the second part. I'm not defending or accusing anyone, I'm just giving this a chance.

[NeedHairASAP]

[IMG]http://www.**********************.com/uploads_user/184000/183838/12879.jpg[/IMG]

[NeedHairASAP]

"Dear Bill,
Good to see you. As suggested by you, since last 20 days, I have a new professional photographer, as you know Stem Cell results normally takes 3-6 months to show results, I will definitely post after pictures then. At present, I will be posting existing pics. Till then, members can talk or email my patients to know about their experiences. I welcome thorough scrutiny by your members and doctors in this forum, so that I can try to provide answers to their informed questions. I am not making any tall claims. At present, we are seeing good results of hair multiplication on approximately 50% patients, average results on approximately 30% patients and unfortunately no results for 20% patients (in which case we repeat Stem Cells HM process once or twice again with no added cost.) As you are aware SHM is an evolving science wherein proving every month. As per my information, our success rate is one of the best in the world in SHM (our FUT and FUE work is gradually replaced by Stem Cells. I see no harm in using combination approach of SHM and FUE. We use FUE on those part of the scalp where SHM growth is not dense. I think with professional good quality pictures, one can easily distinguish between Stem Cell Hair and FUE Hair since FUE Hair will most probably leave dimpling mark at the point of graft incision and FUE implants cannot be as dense as SHM growth of hair. Till few months, when I'll pose high definition professional photographs, members are welcome to communicate with my patients or visit the clinic. I will shortly be posting my Stem Cell lab multiplying and growing cells microscopic photographs. In the mean time, I can take up informed questions on the land scape of global Stem Cell research and what is my hair multiplication process except my proprietory process which is part of my patent application process. Since speaking to you, we have opened 4 more clinics. Next Clinic is coming up at Delhi in Jan. We are doing 100 plus cases per clinic per month with 70% clients for SHM with a team of 4 plastic surgeons, 18 dermatologists and a team of 74 graduate doctors, technicians and nurses. This would not be possible if our clinic is not producing 'good results.' Our competitors, Adreans research is in the second phase of clinical trial, our success rate is much higher than Dr.Gho who is into Stem Cell activation, not multiplication and our technique is much advanced than A Cell Stem Cell activation.We are in the finalisaton process to start joint clinical trials for our third stage of hair differentiation in vitro in the lab with a renowned Germen regenerative lab who were the first lab to produce neo-papillae hair follicle in-vitro. I have introduced myself to this forum to be thoroughly scrutinised and share wisdom by fellow members and expert faculty of doctors.
Regards,
Dr.Nigam "


from HRN




At least one photo seems to be doctored

[inspects]

I have introduced myself to this forum to be thoroughly scrutinised and share wisdom by fellow members and expert faculty of doctors.

Simply using Google and the proper keyword searches, things don't look to good.

[Winston]

Update:

Dr. Nigam has not responded to my email asking for his contact information and offer to speak with Spencer Kobren directly.

[ihavebeenchosenithasbegun]

Look at it closely. He/they could have used another picture at least when they're faking.

[Artista]

I have written to him as well.

[Artista]

Look at it closely. He/they could have used another picture at least when they're faking.

If you look at the persons left side in the 'before' photo ,,the hair outline ,from ear to top, is identical to the 'after' photo. Not a good sign at all for Dr Nigam....!!!!
(same goes for his right side)

[bananana]

I'm a photographer - and 1 thing is for sure:
there are 3 photos that are clearly faked in before/after photos - if anyone is interested, I can fully elaborate with visual proof.

But - lets say this has been done because he didnt want to wait 3-6 months to photograph new results.

So, I'm looking for NEW high resolutiom photos (taken with at least professional canon DSLR camera).

If doctor can provide .DNG files(digital negative photos - all dslr support those),
it can be seen if they are tempered with or not. Period.

Further, I contacted Mr.Bharat Kamdar and he has done only FUE transplant, not hair multiplication. I wish to hear explanation. (maybe patient photos got mixed...)

Doctor, I know you're reading this - I pray to God you're honest - and you
really have the cure. Please give us honest proof or take one person from forum to do the procedure.

[gutted]

If you look at the persons left side in the 'before' photo ,,the hair outline ,from ear to top, is identical to the 'after' photo. Not a good sign at all for Dr Nigam....!!!!
(same goes for his right side)

look at the before picture...its been doctored with clone stamp tool in photoshop.

the side/back hairs are all in the same position too...

[534623]

look at the before picture...its been doctored with clone stamp tool in photoshop.

Which tools and techniques used Whitfield?
Should I analyze his published photos?

[gutted]

Which tools and techniques used Whitfield?
Should I analyze his published photos?

lool why does it always come back to whitfield with you???

keep to the topic

[didi]

so how can we trust this dr when he intentionally tries to deceive public?
I know, he ll blame his website developer for this


he steals images from other researchers and puts it on his website
shows us photoshoped pix claiming they are real
when asked about weightloss complaints he says his wife runs weightloss business and not him, yet on indian tv he craps on about weightloss

Just looka at him here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9td68dQlO8s

dr nigam slimonphone

[Delphi]

But wait, he says his clinic is the first in the world that offer hair multiplication and you guys don't believe him?Maybe he can grow hair over the phone too?

[didi]

Timeline,Dr nigam in 2011- full head of hair, by the jan of 2012 he goes from nw1 to nw6(working in nuclear powerplant),by the july of 2012 dr nigam is back to nw1..


Nigam in 2011, perfect head of hair





In jan 2012 he was nw6



July 2012 dr nigam is nw1