Neogenic by L’Oréal

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 67mph
    replied
    Bullshit stinks whatever you call it and in whatever language!

    Leave a comment:


  • yeahyeahyeah
    replied
    Originally posted by niff1250
    Why is it called vichis and not loreal

    Leave a comment:


  • niff1250
    replied
    it's available :
    lo store che vende prodotti di benessere e bellezza, ordina comodamente da casa tua, spedizioni gratuite.

    Leave a comment:


  • Erick
    replied
    I am losing my sanity, I don't know what's real anymore.

    Leave a comment:


  • Erick
    replied
    Originally posted by Knockin on NW4
    Here is the commercial for Neogenic. I could have done a better job with a GoPro and a smartphone..... http://youtu.be/P98n0Drmudc
    Yes a pretty shitty commercial, I guess is ok for a YouTube video. At least we know the name and all, under Vichy. How much do you guys think that clip was worth to loreal. Is there any news that they will be shipping to USA ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Knockin on NW4
    replied
    Here is the commercial for Neogenic. I could have done a better job with a GoPro and a smartphone..... http://youtu.be/P98n0Drmudc

    Leave a comment:


  • doke
    replied
    So if stemoxydine is the treatment to regrow hair is it for all forms of alopecia and also what happened to L Oreal aminexil should they have combined the two?and not much mention of dht in there studies.
    Im not convinced by there logic captain so lets go at warp speed to hair regrowth hahaha.

    Leave a comment:


  • Erick
    replied
    Originally posted by Dazza
    I always thought joe's source was this websites threads?

    Like he reports what's been going on here, he reads the breaking news here then reports once a week to spencer on the show?

    Tho I have no idea on that, so only a guess on my part.

    Joe does a great job getting the info from here to the listeners.
    Yes about 98% of Joe's information comes from forums like these. Let's be honest breaking news typically hits the forums first, this is why we all check often to see if there is any updates.

    As far as the 20%, well I recall him saying that he applied integral calculus to calculate the area of a typical curve of a head. He then diferentiated the shape and found the min and max of the function of the head by finding the second derivative and setting equal to 0. This is how he got 15%min-30%max, then he got the average of the two and adjusted for coveriance and inflation and thus we get 20%.
    Last edited by Erick; 09-08-2012, 03:34 AM. Reason: Typo

    Leave a comment:


  • Dazza
    replied
    Originally posted by Erick
    Well Joe from Staten Island also said 20%.
    I always thought joe's source was this websites threads?

    Like he reports what's been going on here, he reads the breaking news here then reports once a week to spencer on the show?

    Tho I have no idea on that, so only a guess on my part.

    Joe does a great job getting the info from here to the listeners.

    Leave a comment:


  • Erick
    replied
    Originally posted by Dazza
    So you pulled that 20% number from out of your arse then.

    Be it logical or not. If your gonna state numbers please back them up with a source.
    Well Joe from Staten Island also said 20%.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dazza
    replied
    Originally posted by Erick
    Well all the evidence shows numbers from 15% - 30%, granted there was a few who only grew like 3% most likely norwood 4s. That beign said, it just makes mathematical sense to say 20% is about right.
    So you pulled that 20% number from out of your arse then.

    Be it logical or not. If your gonna state numbers please back them up with a source.

    Leave a comment:


  • Erick
    replied
    Originally posted by Conpecia
    I'm also interested in where that 20% figure came from. Just looking for a bridge between now and all the upcoming treatments. If I can get 20% more hair and maintain that for 3 years all will be well.
    Well all the evidence shows numbers from 15% - 30%, granted there was a few who only grew like 3% most likely norwood 4s. That beign said, it just makes mathematical sense to say 20% is about right.

    Leave a comment:


  • Conpecia
    replied
    I'm also interested in where that 20% figure came from. Just looking for a bridge between now and all the upcoming treatments. If I can get 20% more hair and maintain that for 3 years all will be well.

    Leave a comment:


  • gutted
    replied
    Originally posted by Erick
    Well Joe is a NW6(at least that's what he says) and he said he was going to give it a try, but then again he is getting paid to do so.

    Most likely this will increase 20% of hair re-growth. Even when this stuff does grow hair we are going to continue to have to use fin so it won't fall off. Let's all keep our fingers crossed.
    well if your follicles arent scarred, which is what happens in late norwoods then there may even be chance this could grow SOME hair but nothing miraculous, hence which is why i said not to bother with it...but it depends on the individual.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dazza
    replied
    Originally posted by Erick
    Most likely this will increase 20% of hair re-growth. Even when this stuff does grow hair we are going to continue to have to use fin so it won't fall off.
    What source of information are you pulling this 20% number from?

    Leave a comment:

Working...