Gho- Final Proof?
Collapse
X
-
I'm not an authority on European law, but can't these people just sue Gho for misrepresentation if what the skeptics say is true with regard to splitting follicles? I mean, isn't Gho advertising that he is multiplying hairs, thus creating consideration for a patient to purchase his service over other services? If in fact he is merely splitting follicles, and the patient has relied on his claim that he can multiply hairs, isn't that misrepresentation, in which case the patient could sue him for reliance/expectation damages? How is Gho shielding himself from liability here when his website claims he is multiplying hairs and he has many celebrity clients? Or is European law different? Wish I could see the contract that these people are signing to get this procedure done. That would tell me as much as any test or photo... -
I'm glad we finally have some evidence for this. I will be watching carefully.
If none of those new treatments don't pan out in the next 5 years I will be opting for Gho if further evidence like this continues to pop out.
Why 5 years?
Well I'm too low on NW scale, don't have money and time.
But it is nice to have some ledge for support, in this case Gho...Leave a comment:
-
ex. they extract 2 hairs from a 4 hair graft.....implant the 2 hairs in the recipient.... two hairs grow in recipient.... and two grow in the donor
thusly no increase in total hair countLeave a comment:
-
but this article just explains how a surgeon should perform with a 1 mm punch small skin/hair biopsies and that the latter could eventually be used for transplantation. that’s all.
it seems a real scientific article about transplantation of follicular units with small punches, including hair counts, survival rate of the counted hairs etc doesn’t exist.Leave a comment:
-
it is really hare to know for sure at this stage. I mean, at this stage, we only have macro photos from two GC procedures showing the donor regenerating. And those published journal articles showing the progression- at this stage we only have those dating back to the 90s.
its just toughLeave a comment:
-
I really hope this works but I just don't know at this stage. I'm only just playing Devil's advocate. I remember discussing with some other people before that wanted to get a procedure with Gho and I was saying that at least if you don't get the regeneration you were hoping for the donor would still be in better nick than standard FUE.
I wish you the very best of luck. Keep us updated.
its just toughLeave a comment:
-
I really hope this works but I just don't know at this stage. I'm only just playing Devil's advocate. I remember discussing with some other people before that wanted to get a procedure with Gho and I was saying that at least if you don't get the regeneration you were hoping for the donor would still be in better nick than standard FUE.
I wish you the very best of luck. Keep us updated.Leave a comment:
-
hi Gk , first i wish u good luck for ur experience!
i trust gho , simply because he cannot declare something wrong otherwise he will risk a lot later when people is not satisified. BUT!!! as we repeated many times , WE NEED FREAKING PROVES ahahaha, otherwise this story will never end because there will be one side who say GHO IS WORKING, another side WHO SAY GHO is scam , and this will happen FOREVER! UNTIL!!!!!!!! we show the PROOVES at that point who is wrong will not TALK ANYMORE I HOPE ...lol an we will have the final answer,
so GK im ultraiperthanksfull to u because u are finally doing something u always waited for in ur life PLUS!!! u are helping the totality. that is a great not valuable thing!
thanks a lot I/WE will follow u until the END! yeah!Leave a comment:
-
yeah i noticed too late it was you. Maybe somebody can put this on your other thread...it was hard to put the pictures up in these forums...like this. I was expecting more reactions too...but i apparently most peeps here think gho is a scam until he shows a norwodo 7 to norwood 1 patient.
I wish best of luck man.Leave a comment:
-
by the way, this is me from my 2nd procedure with Gho last week. IronMan at hairsite kindly put the pdf together and circled the extraction points.
I'm actually surprised there isn't more of a reaction on here. I'm really excited by the possibilities of all this and hope to take this further by having more procedures and harvesting from the same donor area for a 3rd time.
I was told by a couple of doctors that I only had approx 2500 grafts available, but I've already had 1400 with Gho and I'm sure I have more than 1100 grafts left, I'm going to need at least another 2000 minimum to achieve what I set out for, I'll go as far as I can with this.
I wish best of luck man.Leave a comment:
-
by the way, this is me from my 2nd procedure with Gho last week. IronMan at hairsite kindly put the pdf together and circled the extraction points.
I'm actually surprised there isn't more of a reaction on here. I'm really excited by the possibilities of all this and hope to take this further by having more procedures and harvesting from the same donor area for a 3rd time.
I was told by a couple of doctors that I only had approx 2500 grafts available, but I've already had 1400 with Gho and I'm sure I have more than 1100 grafts left, I'm going to need at least another 2000 minimum to achieve what I set out for, I'll go as far as I can with this.Leave a comment:
-
Ok, guess I'm going to be the one to stir the pot. This doesn't really prove donor regeration. Picture this, a 3 haired follicle is transected insitu with 2 hairs being transplanted. The remaining damaged single hair sheds or comes out but leaves enough dermal papillae behind for this hair to grow back. So therefore you have transected a 3 haired follicle, transplanted 2 and seen 1 hair grow back in the donor. Is this is what is happening? Maybe, maybe not but be cautious here guys. If Gho can really do what he is saying he should prove it with a showcase result. Food for thought.
So you can't say this is splitting.Leave a comment:
-
Ok, guess I'm going to be the one to stir the pot. This doesn't really prove donor regeration. Picture this, a 3 haired follicle is transected insitu with 2 hairs being transplanted. The remaining damaged single hair sheds or comes out but leaves enough dermal papillae behind for this hair to grow back. So therefore you have transected a 3 haired follicle, transplanted 2 and seen 1 hair grow back in the donor. Is this is what is happening? Maybe, maybe not but be cautious here guys. If Gho can really do what he is saying he should prove it with a showcase result. Food for thought.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: