HST Stem Cell Petition

[NeedHairASAP]

no its my thread! and i want my credibility back!


trace, you are not my favorite punching bag for the time being, or any time.

Im sorry I called you a name. However, the statement that he hasn't proven that the risks outweigh the benefits is false. thats all.


has multiple peer reviewed journal articles showing eficacy
has performed on multiple celebrities
has 20 some odd youtube videos up
has 10 or so patents up on his website
has forum users with pictures




all of which show the Follicular units extracted form the donor grow in the recipient. They do this at the same rate as other leading FUE/STRIP surgeons. They also show donor regrowth.


That being said, I'm not sure what else you need.




Look at GC's photos. If you think thats not donor regenerating, say it. If you think thats not the majority of grafts successfully growing in the recipient, say it.

I find it hard to disagree with what GC has shown us, and then to disagree with journals, celeb photos, youtube videos, and a very informative website put up by the doc himself


we're talking multiple examples of the good recipient growth that you claim doesn't exist, along with photos of donor regeneration from both GC and a prominent dermatology journal

[Kiwi]

GC said that there were no good photos taken of the donor, so we dont actually know. So if you can post 10 links to 10 different peoples donor areas (marco photos or very close to it) that illustrate clearly the donor hairs regrowing... Ill make an appointment tomorrow

Dr Umar has better before and after photos in my opinion. I'm still tossing up between the two. Anyway I'm voting for it too )

[didi]

Guys no need to fight , just lets get back to the topic

I still want more evidence but knowing that he is fully booked out and he has done some high NWs celebrities like Dean Saunders I would say he is legit or in the worst case scenario he is performing most advanced FUE; even if thats the case Im happy, 0.5mm punch is better than 0.8 or 1mm......its hard to imagine some lunatic runin clinics throughout Europe and accepting high NWs celebrities and knowingly cheating them and getting away with it...

[didi]

I like Dr Umars marketing, HSI can learn a lot from him and others

[Kiwi]

I like Dr Umars marketing, HSI can learn a lot from him and others

I think you're right. With all those celebrity clients he could invest in a much better website.

I don't doubt his FUE abilities and I think that if he has mastered FUE with a small punch then that is especially awesome.

I just want to see 10 + donor before, and donor after shots, to make up my mind as to just how good the donor regeneration is.

d

[didi]

Just called clinic in netherlands, I wanted to speak to Marleen but she was having consultation so I spoke to secretary or receptionsit. I didnt bother asking any technical questions since she was strugling with english and we already know how they are going to answer questions so I asked for the next available appointment for treatment and she said it is in July and thats in netherlands...not sure abt london..have to talk to marleen ab london bookings...they are busy as hell with crappy marketing....imagine if they put quality ad on TV, waiting list would be couple of years

[damielmillo]

Ey Didi, i donīt want a good marketing for Gho, i want a real solution, and i think that dr Gho is the best option that we have...time will tell us the truth

[NeedHairASAP]

GC said that there were no good photos taken of the donor, so we dont actually know. So if you can post 10 links to 10 different peoples donor areas (marco photos or very close to it) that illustrate clearly the donor hairs regrowing... Ill make an appointment tomorrow

Dr Umar has better before and after photos in my opinion. I'm still tossing up between the two. Anyway I'm voting for it too )

GC has photos of hairs sprouting from FUE donor holes.... his amatuer photos look exactly like the donor growth shown in two photos in Gho's peer reviewed journal articles...


but hey, guys, I really can't argue this anymore. If the above doesn't convince you, nothing will.

[stillinHS1994]

Signed....were at 70 now

[NeedHairASAP]

I'm not saying I don't want 10 pictures of donor regrowth. I'm saying I don't really need to see them.



GC's pics pretty much confirm that Gho's journal pics were not "photoshopped" or whatever it is you guys think they were


and if they weren't photoshopped, then there probably is donor regrowth. If the pics weren't photoshopped, then I would probably guess that the none-photo statistics in Gho's journal are probably accurate...

the none-photo statistics in Gho's journal claim 80-103% donor regrowth....


but what about the recipient? well, look at joling, schnieder, GC, look at the photos on Gho's site (keeping in mind nobody in the pics got more than 2,000 grafts)




Consider all of the above, and you can't not agree that Gho is the future


Sign the petition, pass the petition on-- post it on Blog comment sections, post it on other forums, etc.