RepliCel - Spencer Kobren's Follow Up Interview With CEO David Hall

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Penny Stock
    replied
    Being that Rolf Hoffman, did the Macrophotography for the Histrogen trials.



    Uploaded with ImageShack.us



    Excerpt from http://sdcasea.com/PDF/Gail_K_Naughton_pub.pdf

    And we know Replicel have begun their follow ups, one could assume
    that the "fully confident" comment made by David Hall, might have come from some very positive interim results.

    And yes I realize its a double blinded trial, but there are only 19 subjects, your going to notice if there is hair where it wasn't present before.

    Leave a comment:


  • Follicle Death Row
    replied
    Surely they will exceed 20%. I'm pretty confident of that. If they had any reservations about it not beating finasteride's supposed 20% they wouldn't even bother pursuing this. It should be substantially better.

    Leave a comment:


  • krewel
    replied
    Originally posted by RichardDawkins
    The thing which speaks in favor for Replicel is the mouse study where they grew hair on spots, where no hairs should grew at all.

    Also they had different growing rates with different types of DP cells, which shows that also ARI can be on the right track and others so
    Yes, and I think it was u who said they probably already tested it on themselves. They supposably did, there would be no way a CEO would claim he'd be sure that they will reach at least 20% regrowth if he did not have any clue about the results of this trial. This stuff is really exciting.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardDawkins
    replied
    The thing which speaks in favor for Replicel is the mouse study where they grew hair on spots, where no hairs should grew at all.

    Also they had different growing rates with different types of DP cells, which shows that also ARI can be on the right track and others so

    Leave a comment:


  • krewel
    replied
    Waiting for that day, haha.

    Leave a comment:


  • howardroarke
    replied
    I dream of the day when I could go to a street hair transplant surgeon in my country to get injections on my head and my hair would grow as thick as a cloud.I would go to the guy who keeps reminding me of my balding and say "Go **** yourself " ..No kidding

    Leave a comment:


  • BoSox
    replied
    Originally posted by CVAZBAR
    Have to agree with this.
    I agree as well

    Leave a comment:


  • CVAZBAR
    replied
    Originally posted by RichardDawkins
    And i wish that all the panic producing people like you would go as well.
    Have to agree with this.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardDawkins
    replied
    And i wish that all the panic producing people like you would go as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairTalk
    replied
    Originally posted by BoSox
    Replicel will exceed 20%, easy.
    I wish everyone who wets his pants with no evidence would just go away. Neither you nor anyone else right now has a shred of evidence regarding the efficacy of RepliCel in treating hairloss in human beings, and no amount of wishful thinking amounts to anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoSox
    replied
    Replicel will exceed 20%, easy.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairTalk
    replied
    I think most persons' curiosities currently hinge, as they should, on whether this process is respectably efficacious. At the moment, we do not know it is, and it's important to keep that in mind through all this talk of whether RepliCel can hit the market "sooner than 2015."

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardDawkins
    replied
    As he said the trials could also stop earlier for good or bad reasons.

    In a good case they see what they want a few months before then they could safe time. I think they are really onto something to stop and reverse hair loss.

    Its always a good sign when they dont even start to talk about " bla bla used in transplantation" and rather encourage the surgeons to pursue new techniques.

    20% increase is pretty damn good, i think its around 1 to 2 NW scales better. Like NW7 to NW5 and etc. Also it can strenghten the donor area as well.

    I also think that its permanent because cells keep the good and useful informations rather then the bad ones if got the choice

    Leave a comment:


  • Bronson
    replied
    Good to know they're not just going through the FDA and 2015 isn't set in stone. I wouldn't mind flying to China in 2014. Of course that could also mean it comes out later than 2015, I guess like them we just don't know, hopefully the results in March will be better than expected.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardDawkins
    replied
    Nice interview but i get the strange feeling that they tested this stuff on humans (themselves) already :-)

    Anyway its nice to see someone talking about a new standard with micro surgery on cellular basis.

    And then people tell me that scalp tattoos are the next best thing

    Btw RepliCel and not RepilCel :-)

    Leave a comment:

Working...