Gho HSi patient had close up pictures

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • krewel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 187

    #61
    Replicel is better anyway

    Comment

    • Sogeking
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 494

      #62
      Originally posted by krewel
      Replicel is better anyway
      Replicel doesn't have phase 1 results yet. So it is all speculation.
      And just in case it has pahse 1 results you would have to wait for phase 3 results to be sure enoguh to make this kinds of claims.

      On the other hand I would like for Gho to get more media exposure, and for us to get a lot of photographic evidence.

      Because guess what, Propecia had plentiful studies done, and i believe one had 48% of patients with hair regrowth, yet a big percentage of users are using Propecia to slow down hair loss. Not for hair regrowth, because if there is any it is minimal.

      All I am saying is, whatever the treatment is the moment I'm gonna believe it works is when I get bunch of people showing me their results. So I am waiting for Gho to prove his claims through the patients with their success stories backed up with detailed photos. I'm gonna give him next 4 or 5 years. Let us see what happens.

      Comment

      • mlao
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 384

        #63
        By now you would think some of the patients in the videos that he presented
        on his website would return for either a second procedure or to show the final
        results of their first.

        Comment

        • Follicle Death Row
          Senior Member
          • May 2011
          • 1058

          #64
          There's one thing about Gho's procedure no one can deny. It's by a mile the least invasive. I mean I have real difficulty trying to find which follicles where taken out on a shaved donor because there seems to be little to no hyperpimentation because the extraction tool is so damn small.

          One thing other FUE doctors could definitely learn is going down to a 0.6mm or even small extraction tool for taking out singles for the hairline as transection never comes into the equation on singles. 1mm or even 0.9mm is unnecessary for singles.

          Comment

          • Kiwi
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2011
            • 1087

            #65
            Originally posted by Follicle Death Row
            There's one thing about Gho's procedure no one can deny. It's by a mile the least invasive. I mean I have real difficulty trying to find which follicles where taken out on a shaved donor because there seems to be little to no hyperpimentation because the extraction tool is so damn small.

            One thing other FUE doctors could definitely learn is going down to a 0.6mm or even small extraction tool for taking out singles for the hairline as transection never comes into the equation on singles. 1mm or even 0.9mm is unnecessary for singles.
            This I tend to agree with. Do you guys think that there is a risk that with such a small tool it could actually damage the follicle?

            Comment

            • Follicle Death Row
              Senior Member
              • May 2011
              • 1058

              #66
              Originally posted by Kiwi
              This I tend to agree with. Do you guys think that there is a risk that with such a small tool it could actually damage the follicle?
              Yes for multis but that's how Gho's method works. You actually transect the follicle and circumvent the yield issues with a growth medium that enables robust growth in the recipient. The transection leaves behind enough dp cells to spring growth of the full follicle again in the donor supposedly. You must transect or damage to multiply seemingly.

              When talking about just taking a single for sure you get more tissue with a bigger punch and this is good for yield in the recipient but no so good for white dotting in the donor. Perhaps Acell's best use will be improving yields with smaller punches on singles and helping to avoid hypopigmentation in the donor. This coupled with smaller extraction tools for singles and maybe 2 haired follicles seems to me to be a realistic application for Acell in practice today. Robust growth in the recipient and fantastic healing in the donor.

              Comment

              • elvispresley
                Senior Member
                • Jun 2011
                • 115

                #67
                where are the images that prove the function of the gho tecnique?

                WE NEED TO PUT ALL THE PHOTOS AND VIDEOS AND PROVES TOGHETER.

                thx

                Comment

                • RichardDawkins
                  Inactive
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 895

                  #68
                  Go to their website. Download the science papers, download the videos.

                  Go to hair loss boards, search for Gho HSI HST or hasci and download the pictures.

                  I have to agree with one poster before me, now Gho had provided very much material and now its up to the surgeons to disproof Gho.

                  Btw they tend to say "Gho must proof it" yeah but hat should he do more what more?

                  Take a look at science literature they all know that follicles have the ability to fully regenerate themselve therefore even a NW7 guy can be fully restored to a dense NW1 over a long time span

                  But one thing is pretty clear, of course Gho is only offering smaller sessions for a higher price, but thats because no other one is offering it so i would do the same. Also its good for him because if others would offer it, guess what he could decrease the price or increase graft number because he knows how to tweak his procedure.

                  If you dont believe me, end an email to tissue engineering researchers, Histogen, Replicel or Aderans and ask them

                  "Do follicles have the ability to fully regenerate themselves?"

                  Comment

                  • Delphi
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 517

                    #69
                    Gho has done nothing but create a buzz about a technique that is completely unproven and has no scientific evidence of working. RichardDawkins is just a naive and desperate person who thinks he knows more than anyone else on these forums when in fact he is probably just some sad lonely guy who gets off on being a forum celebrity and pain in the ass. Gho created a marketing gimmick and idiots like Dawkins are making him rich.

                    Comment

                    • RichardDawkins
                      Inactive
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 895

                      #70
                      Is not proven? Well i dont wanna sound rude but right now you called a lot of researchers Liars and also surgeons.

                      Have you read the first post in this thread? Have you take a look at the picture or did you just decide

                      "Ohhh i am posting something just because i feel bored"

                      Ok btw guys like you and your gnorance are the prime example why dictarships, wars and other bad stuff still can happen in the year 2011

                      Comment

                      • mlao
                        Senior Member
                        • Oct 2009
                        • 384

                        #71
                        So who from this thread emailed Dr. Rassmann?

                        Comment

                        • NeedHairASAP
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2011
                          • 1408

                          #72
                          Originally posted by Delphi
                          Gho has done nothing but create a buzz about a technique that is completely unproven and has no scientific evidence of working. RichardDawkins is just a naive and desperate person who thinks he knows more than anyone else on these forums when in fact he is probably just some sad lonely guy who gets off on being a forum celebrity and pain in the ass. Gho created a marketing gimmick and idiots like Dawkins are making him rich.

                          completely unproven? seriously?


                          have you looked into this at all? there are several sources other than gho that corroborate gho's theory/technique


                          I wouldn't say its completely proven but I'd say its closer to proven than unproven

                          Comment

                          • RichardDawkins
                            Inactive
                            • Jan 2011
                            • 895

                            #73
                            Of course Rassman is not going there right now because " Man how on earth could he sell people the following statement?

                            Well folks i was there........yes ahem this HST well yeah according to MY MY MY Observations is working according to plan......hmmmm but we are not offering it right now because we believe ahhhhh in ahhhhh more Grafts then only 2300 at max

                            One week later Gho raises to 3000 Grafts

                            Rassman : SHIT

                            Comment

                            • NeedHairASAP
                              Senior Member
                              • Jul 2011
                              • 1408

                              #74
                              Originally posted by RichardDawkins
                              Of course Rassman is not going there right now because " Man how on earth could he sell people the following statement?

                              Well folks i was there........yes ahem this HST well yeah according to MY MY MY Observations is working according to plan......hmmmm but we are not offering it right now because we believe ahhhhh in ahhhhh more Grafts then only 2300 at max

                              One week later Gho raises to 3000 Grafts

                              Rassman : SHIT


                              He is so funny



                              "No, haven't looked into HST just yet"

                              [blog entry directly under...]

                              VIDEO ON "MICRO PIGMENTATION"






                              hahahahaaaaa. hes too busy selling people three thousand dollar head tattos

                              Comment

                              • RichardDawkins
                                Inactive
                                • Jan 2011
                                • 895

                                #75
                                I dont wanna sound rude here but i stopped laughing at Micro tattoos. Because this is actually more sad then anything.

                                Lets asume you are NW7 you get micro tattoos soon after you use HST or whatever to get a full head of hair.

                                But some more years later your hair turns white or grey. Guess what SHIT in basket i would say

                                Comment

                                Working...