Replicel

[Maradona]

What may happen next? Anything can happen - nobody has tried an injection of a combination of cells from different parts of the follicle yet, all I have seen so far is one company do DSC the other do DC. People working in research know that cells "know what to do" when they're placed in vivo - surely by combining an injection of DSC + DC the cells will know how to formulate a new follicle once in the correct environment.

I think they did and it worked.

[NotDyingBald]

Maradona, you cannot say that Replicelīs result are disspointing just because your(and ours) need to see 250% regrowth. You claim that Histogen had much better results, but i remind you the results of their first injections after 1 YEAR(i think just one injection), http://jddonline.com/articles/dermatology/1650

How are these results MUCH better than Replicelīs?

The last results weīve seen from Histogen are much better:

http://www.histogen.com/downloads/si..._HSC_Final.pdf (just providing the link to support my opinion)

But as you see, these results happened after 10 Injections at baseline, and repeat dose at 6 weeks.

Plus, Histogen is injecting a solution to already formed follicles. Replicel is injecting NEW cells to form follicles. Hair follicles are formed still in pregancy, and yet, you only see a full head of hair in a baby nearly after one year. You see the point? Why, with a treatment like this, should Replicelīs results be disapointing? Youīre the one facing negativity to support the need to see results. Iīm just facing the things that are presented to us(results) and not following otherīs who claim(like you sometimes) things that are not supported by any logical sense. In the end i hope you and me to get cured from this.

[NotDyingBald]

I know you're pissed because you don't like to hear negativity.My opinion and other's won't change the future of this company so you might as well ignore it.

Iīm not pissed of because hearing negativity. Iīm pissed off of hearing bullshit in a forum that has for main goal help people with hairloss. So some of this forum users should start using it giving their opinions and contributions based on evidence and studys made by people who has the credits for it. Everyone has the right to their opinion for sure, but not based on anything.

[Kiwi]

Replicel should not have created all the hype they did. It was cruel - and now they suck.

[NotDyingBald]

So some of this forum users should start using it giving their opinions and contributions based on evidence and studys made by people who has the credits for it. Everyone has the right to their opinion for sure, but not based on anything.

Replicel should not have created all the hype they did. It was cruel - and now they suck.

Thanks Kiwi, for supporting what iīve said.

[Maradona]

Thanks Kiwi, for supporting what i´ve said.

Bro I am just basing my facts on past HM techniques.

Replicel is using a different cell, it may all well shit on any other past HM technique that involved replicating cells.

At this point we know it's results are no different than past HM techniques.

But good shit could happen down the road, bro.

[TrueGround]

Maradona,

I know you want these treatments to work, and I honestly respect your opinions when you use your head before posting them. The thing that really pisses me off most is when you and others state negative comments so matter-of-factually. I know you are basing your opinion of Replicel on past HM techniques, but this is NOT a past HM technique. Its a CURRENT (technically future) and DIFFERENT approach.

Just quit saying things like "this won't work" or "this company is a total bust" - or whatever it is you're saying along those lines, like you can predict the f*cking future! Not trying to bash on you here, but you know by now that these comments piss people off and I'm beginning to think you do it for attention.

You could be right and you could be dead wrong about what this treatment will offer in its maturity. Fact is, NOBODY knows for sure yet! DAMNIT!!!!

[Maradona]

Maradona,

I know you want these treatments to work, and I honestly respect your opinions when you use your head before posting them. The thing that really pisses me off most is when you and others state negative comments so matter-of-factually. I know you are basing your opinion of Replicel on past HM techniques, but this is NOT a past HM technique. Its a CURRENT (technically future) and DIFFERENT approach.

Just quit saying things like "this won't work" or "this company is a total bust" - or whatever it is you're saying along those lines, like you can predict the f*cking future! Not trying to bash on you here, but you know by now that these comments piss people off and I'm beginning to think you do it for attention.

You could be right and you could be dead wrong about what this treatment will offer in its maturity. Fact is, NOBODY knows for sure yet! DAMNIT!!!!

Yeah of course we exaggerate sometimes. This is a balding forum bro, we are all like that, at least most of us.

I'm just not holding my breath over it. I am a nobody so you might as well ignore my opinion, no sarcasm intended.

Who knows? It might bring something good at the end.

[bananana]

The topic is a bit dead, I see.

Any news? Whats the next milestone?
Or all eyes are on histogen now?

[Kiwi]

The topic is a bit dead, I see.

Any news? Whats the next milestone?
Or all eyes are on histogen now?

What do you mean "now"?

The only eyes on Replicel were those that belonged to TBT newbies that were too excited (blinded by the medusa aka replicel marketing team) to listen to the older members telling them to relax...

[bananana]

What do you mean "now"?

The only eyes on Replicel were those that belonged to TBT newbies that were too excited (blinded by the medusa aka replicel marketing team) to listen to the older members telling them to relax...

Well, you may be right, but I'm wondering whats replicels next move?
Their stock is way below 1$ now, they'll have to provide some good results in the coming months. Or else..

[NotBelievingIt]

Well, you may be right, but I'm wondering whats replicels next move?
Their stock is way below 1$ now, they'll have to provide some good results in the coming months. Or else..

The stock price of a baby bio-tech with no product is practically meaningless.

[UK_]

The stock price of a baby bio-tech with no product is practically meaningless.

I was about to post the exact same comment about an hour ago but I just couldnt be bothered lol.

What matters is:

"Do the researchers have enough funds for Phase 2?" - YES

"Do the researchers feel a phase 1 result warrants a phase 2?" - YES

But obviously the "Replicel-bashing forum crew" are experts on this subject, just like how Histogen bashers on Hairsite were experts about "wnt ligands not being able to grow new hair follicles".

[bananana]

thanks UK,
i'm just speaking as a plain layman.

Just wanted to "bump" the thread, see maybe someone got news or sth..

[Tracy C]

Any news? Whats the next milestone?

It is much too soon for any new news. We need to wait for the 12 month mark on those phase I/IIa subjects - and the six month mark for the phase IIb subjects.

Or all eyes are on histogen now?

I still find this mind set to be very odd. I just don't see the point in rooting for one company or the other - or bashing on one company to favor another. The more companies working on this problem the better. I don't care who wins. As long as somebody wins, we all win.