The percentage growth is, obviously relative. If a person is quite bald in a certain location, and has 10 hairs for instance within a certain area, an increase in the 70% range is not going to be cosmetically significant. That individual might need a 5,000% increase to produce any decent results.
It almost seems that for a study, it seems that a generic percentage increase just is not specific enough. I would like to see percentage increases from different density bands, all the way from slick bald to thinning just slightly. They could have 5-10 categories and measure the percentage increase for each category. That would yield decent percentage increase results.
Ultimately, Replicel, and its stock will not be compared against existing treatements which show 10-20% increases, but against its future competitors such as Aderans.
It almost seems that for a study, it seems that a generic percentage increase just is not specific enough. I would like to see percentage increases from different density bands, all the way from slick bald to thinning just slightly. They could have 5-10 categories and measure the percentage increase for each category. That would yield decent percentage increase results.
Ultimately, Replicel, and its stock will not be compared against existing treatements which show 10-20% increases, but against its future competitors such as Aderans.
Comment