"Before their injections". That's what they claim.
By working I don't mean what they claim, I mean the replication of cells being effective in whatever microscopic improvements you may see and even that IS NOT CONSISTENT in HM techniques since the 90s.
Even taking out those patients out of the trial did not help.
~40% placebo? . Might as well get the placebo, sounds cheaper.
Only thing that replicel is doing is taking cells from a different part of the follicle, they were hoping they were the holy grail cells and from the looks of it, it isn't.
Intercytex had the same results or better but they decided that this was not marketable.
Let it go bro, let it go.
ADERANS is in much better position than replceil.
By working I don't mean what they claim, I mean the replication of cells being effective in whatever microscopic improvements you may see and even that IS NOT CONSISTENT in HM techniques since the 90s.
Even taking out those patients out of the trial did not help.
~40% placebo? . Might as well get the placebo, sounds cheaper.
Only thing that replicel is doing is taking cells from a different part of the follicle, they were hoping they were the holy grail cells and from the looks of it, it isn't.
Intercytex had the same results or better but they decided that this was not marketable.
Let it go bro, let it go.
ADERANS is in much better position than replceil.
Comment