Histogen Update - Spencer Kobren Speaks With Dr. Craig L. Ziering
Collapse
X
-
Anyway, just quickly, I'm curious as to how you know they (histogen) will be presenting next week. It's not on their site is it?Comment
-
Treatments like RU and CB will prevent hair lossComment
-
Did they really achieve this? I never realized they were able to do this. To have grown this much at such an early stage is amazing. I was so worked up on Replicel, I heard about Histogen before any future treatments but lost interest. Wouldn't this be considered a cure in your opinion?Comment
-
Did they really achieve this? I never realized they were able to do this. To have grown this much at such an early stage is amazing. I was so worked up on Replicel, I heard about Histogen before any future treatments but lost interest. Wouldn't this be considered a cure in your opinion?
Makes me wonder. If Replicel could prove that they could make follicles DHT resistant, despite not achieving impressive regrowth, then Histogen+Replicel would be a cure to hairloss, would it not?
That all would hinge on Replicel being able to show that they made follicles DHT resistant though. I heard that they thought they could, but I heard a lot of stuff from them.Comment
-
Bosox, they said they achieved 73% in a year on their site, so I assume they really did
Yes that's what I meant, the new follicles aren't DHT resistant but I believe the embryonic complex used by histogen will ''reset'' the follicle to where they were when they were first made. I.e. in the womb or as babies. Therefore I would assume that if you started losing your hair at 23 then Histogen would give you 23 more years.
However!! I also think that as a baby you have no DHT in your system until you reach puberty, which is around 13. So those follicles won't be immune for 23 years because DHT will be attacking them. I would assume that with Histogen those new hairs wouldn't start to thin for 10 years.
This is all my own take on it. Nothing concrete.Comment
-
I'm guessing that by "doesn't prevent hairloss", he means that the newly grown hairs are not DHT resistent and will suffer the same fate as the old ones, as they ARE the old ones.
Makes me wonder. If Replicel could prove that they could make follicles DHT resistant, despite not achieving impressive regrowth, then Histogen+Replicel would be a cure to hairloss, would it not?
That all would hinge on Replicel being able to show that they made follicles DHT resistant though. I heard that they thought they could, but I heard a lot of stuff from them.Comment
-
Im quite sure that 73% is just one patient, and not an average. Unless anyone can prove otherwise?Comment
-
even if its only 50% in average i still think its absolutely freakin amazing.
Many specialist say that you notice thinning when you lost 50% of the hair so for young people this means that they can get their HSC immediately and maybe keep all of the hair forever (in combination with Fin maybe)
and for people with progressed mph its still an amazing improvement
but i guess we have to wait and see how it works, if its even going to hit the marketComment
Comment