Histogen Update - Spencer Kobren Speaks With Dr. Craig L. Ziering
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
I still find it hard to take Aderans seriously.
ADERANS GOLD 「ちくしょう!」篇 是在优酷播出的娱乐高清视频,于2010-10-07 11:30:47上线。视频内容简介:ADERANS GOLD 高嶋政宏 「ちくしょう!」篇Comment
-
Yeah I'm thinking that a 10 year old now who is to start balding at 30 won't have any major concerns. In 20 years there'll surely be vastly improved treatments. I'm not talking about gene therapy but Histogen and Aderans and such options will be pretty common place and not such a big deal. Hell a combo of corteoxolone 17 alpha propionate and Histogen could change things big time in 5-7 years. Such treatments could buy someone 10 years perhaps. So really in the example of that 10 year old they could make it to 40 without even considering hair cloning or any form of HT.Comment
-
. Japanese humour. They're so nutty.
Comment
-
I think today is the only time where we could be optimistic because right now there is no way back.
Even traditional transplants today could achive a good deal for you. And Who knows, maybe in 2 years stuff such as Cole can produce consitent 80% regrowth :-)Comment
-
I'm putting more eggs into the 'Dr. Cole using Acell' basket everyday.Comment
-
Comment
-
Plucked hairs and FUE multiplication will be future treatments i am sure. I mean even traditional transplants on high NW scales are getting better and better. Now put the factor of expanded donor at hand and you are good to goComment
-
Dr. Robert Bernstein has said that Cloning is within ten years. while I know we have heard it again and again from all the "stealth mode companies" I would tend to trust a source like Dr. Bernstein because he generally does not make foolish uninformed statements. Still it's a long time!
http://www.bernsteinmedical.com/hair...ew-york-times/Comment
-
I really don't know; right now, though (i.e., speaking to ten–twenty years from now, based on to-day), I certainly wouldn't call it a sure-thing that it will. Frankly, I'm trying hard to withhold any such optimism until there's fairly widespread (which I'd characterize, here, as being ~70%) acceptance within the community of reputable hair-transplant surgeons that limitless donor-supply and/or "non-surgical" hair-restoration have/has arrivedl; I'm reluctant to adopt such hope on people's proposing things that "look promising."Comment
-
This was a good interview from Dr. Bernstein last November.
Comment
-
I really don't know; right now, though (i.e., speaking to ten–twenty years from now, based on to-day), I certainly wouldn't call it a sure-thing that it will. Frankly, I'm trying hard to withhold any such optimism until there's fairly widespread (which I'd characterize, here, as being ~70%) acceptance within the community of reputable hair-transplant surgeons that limitless donor-supply and/or "non-surgical" hair-restoration have/has arrivedl; I'm reluctant to adopt such hope on people's proposing things that "look promising."Comment
-
I know. It's annoying alright. At least we've got some legimate human trials going on. There's too much money in this for some not to crack it eventually. Whether we'll be able to avail of it is another matter.Comment
Comment