If someone came here saying he was growing hair with dog feces and dermarolling, should people discuss the proposed method of action or ask him for hard evidence?
There are hundred of studies with ambiguous results concerning MPB. They are using Zinc and copper this time. But what is stopping anyone from picking, let's say, curcumin and rosemary and making a "revolutionary product" that is supported by a dozen of ambiguous and contradictory studies?
Discussion about the proposed method of action should only come after the supposed results are proven. Otherwise, you only give scammers a free pass. The Chlorine guy took advantage of that and sold his solution behind the scenes, even when he promised he wasn't doing it
Not to say that it just feeds the bs concerning alternative treatments. There are people that still swear by Zix to this day, and it only needed a couple of dubious posters with "evidence" and a handful of supporters that were more interested in the "proposed method of action" instead of asking themselves if they were being fooled again
There are hundred of studies with ambiguous results concerning MPB. They are using Zinc and copper this time. But what is stopping anyone from picking, let's say, curcumin and rosemary and making a "revolutionary product" that is supported by a dozen of ambiguous and contradictory studies?
Discussion about the proposed method of action should only come after the supposed results are proven. Otherwise, you only give scammers a free pass. The Chlorine guy took advantage of that and sold his solution behind the scenes, even when he promised he wasn't doing it
Not to say that it just feeds the bs concerning alternative treatments. There are people that still swear by Zix to this day, and it only needed a couple of dubious posters with "evidence" and a handful of supporters that were more interested in the "proposed method of action" instead of asking themselves if they were being fooled again
Comment