low systemic absorption technology

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FearTheLoss
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 1581

    #16
    This needs to be brought to the attention of Joe T and some other representatives that could potentially do something with it. This, in my opinion, could be our best hope right now.

    Comment

    • NeedHairASAP
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2011
      • 1408

      #17
      four options:

      1. Alert them of this obvious market, hope they move on the insight

      2. Get ahold of Merc, Cosmo, other companies-- or people into early stage medical investing--- and hope they license the tech to make these products

      3. One of the more legitimate users could start a crowdfund campaign to fund a company that would license their tech for use-- may want to inquire about the ballpark cost of licensing

      4. alert kane, or other foreign chemist, to attempt to reverse engineer this

      Comment

      • FearTheLoss
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2012
        • 1581

        #18
        Originally posted by NeedHairASAP
        four options:

        1. Alert them of this obvious market, hope they move on the insight

        2. Get ahold of Merc, Cosmo, other companies-- or people into early stage medical investing--- and hope they license the tech to make these products

        3. One of the more legitimate users could start a crowdfund campaign to fund a company that would license their tech for use-- may want to inquire about the ballpark cost of licensing

        4. alert kane, or other foreign chemist, to attempt to reverse engineer this
        5. Alert a few doctors: Rahal, Hasson and Wong, Dr. Wesley, Dr. Cole, Dr. Greco, Dr. Bauman...people who are highly respected and on the progressive end of the industry. They could contact this company and find out how to do it and have a pharmacy make it for them so they can prescribe it.

        Comment

        • cichlidfort
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2013
          • 262

          #19
          So are we all going to stay complacent here with our dicks out or are we going to make a group effort to propagate our "cutting edge" idea in regards to utilizing an already established hair loss drug (dut or fin) with this technology. And, if this worked, how would millions of men have access to this slow absorption technology? Wouldn't they have to mass produce this? Wouldn't that alone take years to do?

          Comment

          • Arashi
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2012
            • 3888

            #20
            Originally posted by cichlidfort
            So are we all going to stay complacent here with our dicks out or are we going to make a group effort to propagate our "cutting edge" idea in regards to utilizing an already established hair loss drug (dut or fin) with this technology. And, if this worked, how would millions of men have access to this slow absorption technology? Wouldn't they have to mass produce this? Wouldn't that alone take years to do?
            User 'Inbrugge' said on the previous page he contacted the company. Let's see if he gets a reply before we all start mailing them and all ask the same question.

            Comment

            • NeedHairASAP
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2011
              • 1408

              #21
              Originally posted by FearTheLoss
              5. Alert a few doctors: Rahal, Hasson and Wong, Dr. Wesley, Dr. Cole, Dr. Greco, Dr. Bauman...people who are highly respected and on the progressive end of the industry. They could contact this company and find out how to do it and have a pharmacy make it for them so they can prescribe it.
              +1

              Comment

              • burtandernie
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2012
                • 1563

                #22
                Its funny because I posted a while ago about wondering why a company doesnt focus on vehicles and then license it to companies so every company doesnt reinvent the wheel. Its not like developing a vehicle is some simple thing to do but every company spends time/money inventing their own each time kind of silly
                Hopefully this helps but might be a bit early to say. Cant be bad though for MPB since its a topical problem.

                Comment

                • cichlidfort
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2013
                  • 262

                  #23
                  Originally posted by burtandernie
                  Its funny because I posted a while ago about wondering why a company doesnt focus on vehicles and then license it to companies so every company doesnt reinvent the wheel. Its not like developing a vehicle is some simple thing to do but every company spends time/money inventing their own each time kind of silly
                  Hopefully this helps but might be a bit early to say. Cant be bad though for MPB since its a topical problem.
                  I'm baffled that no one has still yet to find an efficient vehicle for CB yet.

                  Comment

                  • Arashi
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2012
                    • 3888

                    #24
                    So,any response yet ?if not i Will try Tomorrow to contact them

                    Comment

                    • burtandernie
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2012
                      • 1563

                      #25
                      I would like to see them try topical spiro and compare the results back to the normal stuff everyone commonly uses. I think cosmo tested CB and topical spiro and got much better results with that more advanced delivery system. Topical spiro might work like a charm if delivered properly and its already tested for topical use the chemical itself. Everyone assumes topical spiro is weak and doesnt work but it could easily just be the vehicle

                      Comment

                      • FearTheLoss
                        Senior Member
                        • Dec 2012
                        • 1581

                        #26
                        I've emailed them twice with no response. Maybe someone should put in a call.

                        Comment

                        • NeedHairASAP
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2011
                          • 1408

                          #27
                          You guys need to think before you start firing off emails....

                          what is in it for them? keep this in mind while you're drafting. Also, try not to sound like a total bald crazy person...

                          Were better off emailing legit docs/academics/investors/companies who can then contact these guys. I doubt a few crazy bald guy emails will make them change their 12 month strategy overnight... or at all.

                          I suggest people begin a contact list of docs/companies/investors/etc and then we have the least crazy forum member do the emailing

                          Comment

                          • FearTheLoss
                            Senior Member
                            • Dec 2012
                            • 1581

                            #28
                            As I was the one who discovered this, I emailed them before even posting on the forum. Furthermore, I'm a medical student at a top 5 university in the world, so emailing from my academic email account would catch the attention of just about anyone in the medical field.

                            I agree, however, that we should have a doctor contact them and try to formulate their own topical treatment using their technology.

                            Comment

                            • Arashi
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2012
                              • 3888

                              #29
                              Originally posted by FearTheLoss
                              i think this is a really good idea because this is something we could get NOW.
                              I agree man. It's actually the most promising news for a short term solution that I've heard in ages ! I agree that it's very possible that no safety trials are even needed, since the medicines are already approved and theoretically we could have a topical Fin or Dut without sides before the end of the year IF indeed turns out trial testing is not needed (and of course IF it actually even works). But this is really hopeful and exciting news !!

                              Comment

                              • clarence
                                Senior Member
                                • Sep 2012
                                • 278

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Arashi
                                Awesome find indeed ! Topical dut without sides would indeed pretty much equal a cure for most of us
                                What the hell are you saying Arashi? Dutasteride, like finasteride, sucks at regrowing lost hair for stuff which, for you, equals a 'cure'. And why would a topical regrow hair any more effectively than the oral alternative......

                                Comment

                                Working...