Sm04554

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Renee
    replied
    I don't understand why intercytex & aderans shut down after spending all that money. They still have access to a lot of capital and could of continued doing research. Closing shop and moving on seems to me they had no hope of finding the cure.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigentries
    replied
    Originally posted by maver1ck
    Common sense would say yes, they have something to promote so they obviously spend what money they can to get the 3rd sponsorship spot. We KNOW they have something, but we just dont know how effectively it works. With that being said why promote yourselves when you know your product doesn't even work? If we can believe those people on this thread with knowledge of clinical trials (and I dont really see why any laymen shouldnt) then there really is something to the second round of testing and maybe they will make a full scale announcement.
    Just so people get it into context. Aderans had the same sponsorship in the last congress

    Leave a comment:


  • champpy
    replied
    Originally posted by maver1ck
    We KNOW they have something, but we just dont know how effectively it works. With that being said why promote yourselves when you know your product doesn't even work?
    Thats a question id love to ask the makers of rogaine

    Leave a comment:


  • macbeth81
    replied
    If I am not mistaken Aderans had multiple, smaller Phase 2 trials to test different protocols. They were doing trial/error approach to see what worked (nothing). For SM04554 the two Phase 2 trials use the same protocol, but the second one is taking biopsies (pre/post application). They didn't take biopsies at the beginning of the initial trial, thus they need to start the trial over to get the initial, pre-treatment biopsies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Renee
    replied
    Didn't aderans do a phase 2b to take punch biopsies like sm is doing now? Look at what happened to them.

    Leave a comment:


  • lacazette
    replied
    Originally posted by nameless
    Proctor and Gamble does not even have a respected treatment for hair loss.

    What a bunch of jerks.
    You're right dude, but they are supporting several labs research like this one for example in Southampton university, so not surprising to see they are a sponsor of the event:



    Microstructural modelling of skin mechanics

    "The project aims to gain a mechanistic insight into the biomechanics of the skin, particularly around hair follicles via the development of advanced multiscale constitutive equations and micromechanical models integrated into a multiphysics finite element environment.

    The project is supported by Procter&Gamble
    the results of the PhD project have the potential to impact the life of hundreds of millions of male and female consumers across the globe."

    Leave a comment:


  • maver1ck
    replied
    Originally posted by champpy
    While they may not have a respected treatment, P&G a huge company. Rogaine (while absolute poo in my mind) is a household name.

    I really cannot think of any other reason why Samumed would be such a large sponsor if they didn't have something they are trying to promote. Am I wrong on this? If I am, can someone please tell me why else they would be part of the conference ?
    Common sense would say yes, they have something to promote so they obviously spend what money they can to get the 3rd sponsorship spot. We KNOW they have something, but we just dont know how effectively it works. With that being said why promote yourselves when you know your product doesn't even work? If we can believe those people on this thread with knowledge of clinical trials (and I dont really see why any laymen shouldnt) then there really is something to the second round of testing and maybe they will make a full scale announcement.

    Leave a comment:


  • nameless
    replied
    Originally posted by champpy
    While they may not have a respected treatment, P&G a huge company. Rogaine (while absolute poo in my mind) is a household name.

    I really cannot think of any other reason why Samumed would be such a large sponsor if they didn't have something they are trying to promote. Am I wrong on this? If I am, can someone please tell me why else they would be part of the conference ?

    I agree with you. I don't think Samumed would waste time and other resources on the Hair Loss Congress if their product isn't a significant improvement over the existing treatments (propecia, dutasteride, and Rogaine).

    Leave a comment:


  • champpy
    replied
    While they may not have a respected treatment, P&G a huge company. Rogaine (while absolute poo in my mind) is a household name.

    I really cannot think of any other reason why Samumed would be such a large sponsor if they didn't have something they are trying to promote. Am I wrong on this? If I am, can someone please tell me why else they would be part of the conference ?

    Leave a comment:


  • champpy
    replied
    While they may not have a respected treatment, P&G a huge company. Rogaine (while absolute poo in my mind) is a household name.

    I really cannot think of any other reason why Samumed would be such a large sponsor if they didn't have something they are trying to promote. Am I wrong on this? If I am, can someone please tell me why else they would be part of the conference ?

    Leave a comment:


  • failly
    replied
    I have found two interesting articles coming from 2013. Don't know if these links are already posted.



    Leave a comment:


  • nameless
    replied
    Originally posted by xyz123
    First time they've been a sponsor. And Women's Rogaine and Procter & Gamble are the top 2.

    http://www.hair2015.org/

    Proctor and Gamble does not even have a respected treatment for hair loss.

    What a bunch of jerks.

    Leave a comment:


  • nameless
    replied
    We should be contacting our US senators and asking them to rush approve the 21st Century Cures Act. Anyone who does not do this is not helping to overcome baldness. Anyone who does not do this is a slacker who does what he can to contribute to the cause of defeating baldness.

    Leave a comment:


  • xyz123
    replied
    Originally posted by champpy
    I read earlier in this thread that Samumed is the 3rd largest sponsor of the Hair Conference. Can anyone tell me if this is their first time as a sponsor? Also, who are the other two sponsors that are ahead of Samumed?

    If this is their first time, and they have a large presence, this tells me that they may actually have something they want to announce.
    First time they've been a sponsor. And Women's Rogaine and Procter & Gamble are the top 2.

    חושבים על השתלת שיער בארץ או בחו"ל? כל ההבדלים בין ישראל, יוון ומדינות נוספות – מחירים, שיטות, המלצות וחוות דעת. היכנסו לבדוק הכל לפני שתבחרו!

    Leave a comment:


  • champpy
    replied
    I read earlier in this thread that Samumed is the 3rd largest sponsor of the Hair Conference. Can anyone tell me if this is their first time as a sponsor? Also, who are the other two sponsors that are ahead of Samumed?

    If this is their first time, and they have a large presence, this tells me that they may actually have something they want to announce.

    Leave a comment:

Working...