is Histogen going to start phase 2b any time soon?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hellouser
    Senior Member
    • May 2012
    • 4419

    #16
    Originally posted by rdawg
    technically in Asia they could release it right after 2b i believe, so as soon as late 2014-early 2015 there! but NA will be 1-2 years behind.
    This.

    The 2018-19 speculated release date is not likely.

    Comment

    • reckless
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2013
      • 26

      #17
      Histogen's results look poor from the pictures they released.

      Comment

      • Kiwi
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2011
        • 1087

        #18
        Originally posted by hellouser
        This.

        The 2018-19 speculated release date is not likely.
        And you'd know right...

        Comment

        • yeahyeahyeah
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2011
          • 1776

          #19
          Originally posted by reckless
          Histogen's results look poor from the pictures they released.
          How?

          They have clearly shown that it thickens up thinning hair. It just doesnt grow hair on slick bald spots.

          Histogen, in conjunction with HTs is how it will work.

          Comment

          • Kiwi
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2011
            • 1087

            #20
            Originally posted by yeahyeahyeah
            How?

            They have clearly shown that it thickens up thinning hair. It just doesnt grow hair on slick bald spots.

            Histogen, in conjunction with HTs is how it will work.
            lol - dude any poster with less than 30 posts should not be taken seriously. given other options (err lack of options) i think histogen kicks ass.

            Comment

            • Axel
              Member
              • Dec 2012
              • 45

              #21
              Originally posted by hellouser
              Its currently a 10 billion dollar annual industry with 99% of products that DON'T WORK.
              And will stay like this as long as tricked people is willing to pay for it. Just like the tobacco industry... We live in deceiving times. As usual only the nonconformist will help to push this to the next level.. In the meanwhile we will have to listen the rants of the bald sheeple about how crazy we are for wanting to change the state of things...

              Comment

              • reckless
                Junior Member
                • Jun 2013
                • 26

                #22
                Originally posted by Kiwi
                lol - dude any poster with less than 30 posts should not be taken seriously. given other options (err lack of options) i think histogen kicks ass.
                It's fine for early thinners I guess but not for severe hair loss.

                Comment

                • HairBane
                  Senior Member
                  • Apr 2013
                  • 300

                  #23
                  Originally posted by reckless
                  It's fine for early thinners I guess but not for severe hair loss.
                  But it was kind of expected that NW2-3 thinning people would be cured before slick black NW7's wasn't it?

                  I wonder if people would be willing to go from NW7-NW2/3 using hair doubling transplants and then go the rest of the way with HSC, replicel and ji gami so that the hairline is more natural?

                  Comment

                  • UK_
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2011
                    • 2691

                    #24
                    Originally posted by HairBane
                    But it was kind of expected that NW2-3 thinning people would be cured before slick black NW7's wasn't it?

                    I wonder if people would be willing to go from NW7-NW2/3 using hair doubling transplants and then go the rest of the way with HSC, replicel and ji gami so that the hairline is more natural?
                    Ji Gami is dead.

                    Comment

                    • DepressedByHairLoss
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2011
                      • 854

                      #25
                      Originally posted by UK_
                      Ji Gami is dead.
                      It is not dead. Spencer just said that Aderans stopped funding Washenik and company because the business executives were more concerned about making money with wigs and surgery. Spencer said that Washenik and his team were not giving up on their technology and I really don't understand why they are not trying to create a fundraising drive to get their trials back up and running.

                      Comment

                      • hellouser
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2012
                        • 4419

                        #26
                        Originally posted by DepressedByHairLoss
                        It is not dead. Spencer just said that Aderans stopped funding Washenik and company because the business executives were more concerned about making money with wigs and surgery. Spencer said that Washenik and his team were not giving up on their technology and I really don't understand why they are not trying to create a fundraising drive to get their trials back up and running.
                        Even if the results were only 25% in increased density... I'd still pay good money to get the procedure done.

                        Aderans board members are effing quacks. There's not a shred of empathy from those scumbags... just profiteering at the expense of hair loss sufferers... wigs over proper treatment? Those guys are a complete JOKE.

                        Comment

                        • yeahyeahyeah
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2011
                          • 1776

                          #27
                          Originally posted by reckless
                          It's fine for early thinners I guess but not for severe hair loss.
                          follica is better for higher norwood

                          Comment

                          • hellouser
                            Senior Member
                            • May 2012
                            • 4419

                            #28
                            Originally posted by yeahyeahyeah
                            follica is better for higher norwood
                            *should be.

                            We still don't really know how well Follica works. But its safe to assume that if they can create follicles through neogenesis... GAME OVER.

                            Comment

                            • rdawg
                              Senior Member
                              • Jun 2012
                              • 996

                              #29
                              If i still have around the same amount of hair within a few years when histogen launches, i'd definitely get a procedure done if it's around $1000 bucks or so.(obviously i hope its less).

                              Comment

                              • Scientalk56
                                Senior Member
                                • Nov 2012
                                • 280

                                #30
                                So, am i supposed to look at histogen phase 2a results and masturbate?

                                what the hell is going on with this company

                                why are they even doing another phase 2 if they don't have enough funding/time for it?

                                It's so annoying

                                Comment

                                Working...