Good News -- I just called Aderans Research Institute in Atlanta
Collapse
X
-
-
Follica's procedure would have to look like this:
Make a suitable wound that is deep enough (I think a single wound would be similar to FUE punch) -> inject FGF9 in suitable moment into the wound (I guess it would have to be done pretty fast before the healing processes start)-> repeat it thousands of times, because in theory one wound + one injection would create one graft.
So they would have to create some kind of machine that would be doing that fast.
Assuming Follica is still alive.
It is more likely going to be a large, open wound, such as dermabrasion done with a laser or abrasives, then application of a topical.Comment
-
Comment
-
- Follica's team has had a lot of turnover the past few years. Many of their senior staff like Prouty, Barman have left.
- A number of lower level employees have also left the team.
- They ran clinical trials three years ago, and haven't ran another one since then. At least if they have that info is not public. A three year gap is pretty substantial IMO.
- Some people have tried similar dermabrasion protocols with topicals like lithium and gefitinib, and haven't gotten any notable regrowth. People used to do that on Hairsite in 08-09. Given that Follica's treatment is dermabrasion+lithium gel, it makes me a little suspicious.
- Last year Garza released a paper showing that PGD2 inhibited HF neogenesis. Since Follica didn't inhibit PGD2 in their clinical trial, I wonder how successful they were.
- Follica wasn't even trying to grow terminal hairs, but rather "neogenic-like" hair follicles, which are smaller than vellus hairs. How do those become terminal?
- Simply put, we just don't think the past procedure of Dermabrasion+Li is enough to create follicles. There has to be more to it. We likely will need to upregulate FGF, inhibit PGD2, and perhaps add estrogen to make them resistant to DHT. But those are all guesses.
I respect Follica's team and the work they do, but, obviously I'm happy to be wrong. In a sense, I suspect the FGF9 study (which they knew years ago btw) was a subtle way of announcing that they are still alive.Comment
-
I think it's pretty safe to say Follica is on to something, they may end up being wrong I guess there's always a chance, but folks if they went out and made the kind of statements they have made so far it means they must have pretty solid evidence to back up what they are saying, I can't believe everyone here is always assuming these researchers are so reckless when they talk.
And as far as all the deadlines, no one can say for sure but I think it's pretty safe to assume if anyone of these companies ends up having a final cure or good substitute, it will be within 5-10 years at most.Comment
-
I am not as knowledgeable as you kindly suggest, but my opinion:
- Follica's team has had a lot of turnover the past few years. Many of their senior staff like Prouty, Barman have left.
- A number of lower level employees have also left the team.
- They ran clinical trials three years ago, and haven't ran another one since then. At least if they have that info is not public. A three year gap is pretty substantial IMO.
- Some people have tried similar dermabrasion protocols with topicals like lithium and gefitinib, and haven't gotten any notable regrowth. People used to do that on Hairsite in 08-09. Given that Follica's treatment is dermabrasion+lithium gel, it makes me a little suspicious.
- Last year Garza released a paper showing that PGD2 inhibited HF neogenesis. Since Follica didn't inhibit PGD2 in their clinical trial, I wonder how successful they were.
- Follica wasn't even trying to grow terminal hairs, but rather "neogenic-like" hair follicles, which are smaller than vellus hairs. How do those become terminal?
- Simply put, we just don't think the past procedure of Dermabrasion+Li is enough to create follicles. There has to be more to it. We likely will need to upregulate FGF, inhibit PGD2, and perhaps add estrogen to make them resistant to DHT. But those are all guesses.
I respect Follica's team and the work they do, but, obviously I'm happy to be wrong. In a sense, I suspect the FGF9 study (which they knew years ago btw) was a subtle way of announcing that they are still alive.Comment
-
Hi desmond84, I would like to ask about your expertise, what do you think is the best way to inject the 3D DP cells into the scalps ? I mean, about the deap etc.. In order to not damage the bulge and to reach a large area of hair ? Any ideas ?Comment
-
He said he had a long conversation with Ken Washenik and that the rumors are true. The Aderans board has decided to stop funding the Aderans Research Institute (ARI). Apparently the people involved with ARI want to keep going but they will now have to receive funding from other sources. Spencer alluded to the idea of a possible kickstarter in the future to raise funds.Comment
-
He talked about it on yesterday's show.
He said he had a long conversation with Ken Washenik and that the rumors are true. The Aderans board has decided to stop funding the Aderans Research Institute (ARI). Apparently the people involved with ARI want to keep going but they will now have to receive funding from other sources. Spencer alluded to the idea of a possible kickstarter in the future to raise funds.Comment
-
Comment
-
LOL Kickstarter from a company owned by a multi-million $ enterprise. What bullshit.
I think it's incredibly shameful of the company not to put out a public anouncement about their closure, we've been following them for the best part of a decade and they cant even tell us that they have failed?
Ridiculous. Obviously the parent company isn’t happy with the results and is refusing to throw more money at ARI – the thing is, nobody in their right mind will be buying their stupid Hair Club hair replacement products.
I would rather spend a bit more money and go to the HASCI INSTITUTE.
As for the first post, the guy who phoned Aderans was clearly fobbed off with some bullshit by some semi-exec that wanted him off the phone.Comment
Comment