CG 210 w/ link to before/after pics

[habemus]

[QUOTE=habemus;135330][/QUOTE



Currently this is only the evolution with CG 210

Att,

[habemus]

Currently this is only the evolution with CG 210

Att,[/QUOTE]

[Bocaj]

hi hab i here thar legacy may be doing a trial of minoxidil+cg210 now that may produce even better results.

Noooooooo...really? Why would minox be needed?

He's just posting the same stupid-a** pictures btw.

[Bocaj]

For Habemus:

Why do you try to get away with using 3 of the same picture to show your early progress?

Why do you lie about time frames- we all know hair does not grow that fast in 3 months.

Why do you refuse to post pictures that we requested, and instead just kept posting the same pictures you've posted before? We now see, via the pictures on the company's website, that you indeed do have/use a comb-over. So I've just answered my own question..but I'm sure I'm not the only one who'd LOVE to hear/read your excuse.

Why do some of your "after" pictures show a fairly full crown of hair, when others do not?

Why is it that in various other forums your posts have been deleted or edited out and/or you've been banned? (which, as I said above..just happened again)

[doke]

whats up ?

[PatientlyWaiting]

Pictures look the same to me. Not really that impressive.

Thank god someone thinks the same as me....

I saw the pics and was like 'where's the new growth'. There is no difference. In some photos the before hair is wet and then the after photo is dry.

Why are people like 'wow, this is amazing' HUH ! What u guys looking at?

I felt the same way, was wondering what exactly are people seeing.

[habemus]

Originally Posted by BoSox View Post
Pictures look the same to me. Not really that impressive.

??? Ok



I see....

[Bocaj]

For Habemus:

Why do you try to get away with using 3 of the same picture to show your early progress?

Why do you lie about time frames- we all know hair does not grow that fast in 3 months.

Why do you refuse to post pictures that we requested, and instead just kept posting the same pictures you've posted before? We now see, via the pictures on the company's website, that you indeed do have/use a comb-over. So I've just answered my own question..but I'm sure I'm not the only one who'd LOVE to hear/read your excuse.

Why do some of your "after" pictures show a fairly full crown of hair, when others do not?

Why is it that in various other forums your posts have been deleted or edited out and/or you've been banned? (which, as I said above..just happened again)

[habemus]

Sorry but your level of knowledge is outdated. Between my photo BEFORE and latter passed four months and 15 days.

I do not waste my precious time with bla bla bla bla ... etc.
I show that a lotion without side effects can, in my case, a gain appreciable evolution.

[Bocaj]

Your level of knowledge is nonexistent. See how easy that is?

If you are genuine- answer the questions. To respond to what you said there- no...you actually said 3 months for the one. Which I mention in my questions.

For Habemus:

Why do you try to get away with using 3 of the same picture to show your early progress?

Why do you lie about time frames- we all know hair does not grow that fast in 3 months.

Why do you refuse to post pictures that we requested, and instead just kept posting the same pictures you've posted before? We now see, via the pictures on the company's website, that you indeed do have/use a comb-over. So I've just answered my own question..but I'm sure I'm not the only one who'd LOVE to hear/read your excuse.

Why do some of your "after" pictures show a fairly full crown of hair, when others do not?

Why is it that in various other forums your posts have been deleted or edited out and/or you've been banned? (which, as I said above..just happened again)

[doke]

habs please post a new picture of crown has it completely regrown since old pics?

[habemus]

My friends,
With each passing day notice improvements with the use of this lotion. Look at the picture and compare with the previous, impressive, no?

Att,

[doke]

many thanks for reply hab but its the same picture as you have already posted we want a new picture of crown has it regrown yet ?

[habemus]

many thanks for reply hab but its the same picture as you have already posted we want a new picture of crown has it regrown yet ?

doke,

It's not the same picture, no. Taken today. Compare with previous no difference can be minimal but it's another photo of the same area where I circle a brand natural (stepped) to reference the position and monitor the regrowth.


Att,

[doke]

so the very small hairs have not grown much? as they were there from the start were they not? and can you not take a picture overhead from back?