-
-
For doke- do you still not get it? He's not even providing what YOU are requesting. But read bigentries post above.
As for his latest, supposedly new, picture. Again, how is it that he's got just little hairs growing there, yet in the past he's posted pictures such as this, claiming such results in 3 months?:
And for Habemus:
Why do you try to get away with using 3 of the same picture to show your early progress?
Why do you lie about time frames- we all know hair does not grow that fast in 3 months.
Why do you refuse to post pictures that we requested, and instead just kept posting the same pictures you've posted before? We now see, via the pictures on the company's website, that you indeed do have/use a comb-over. So I've just answered my own question..but I'm sure I'm not the only one who'd LOVE to hear/read your excuse.
Why do some of your "after" pictures show a fairly full crown of hair, when others do not?
Why is it that in various other forums your posts have been deleted or edited out and/or you've been banned? (which, as I said above..just happened again)Comment
-
Exactly, had spent three months with the lotion Cg 210, whether this and the other photo was taken on the same day.
Att,
Comment
-
You're just showing yourself to be a liar and shill with every post. Not only do you at other times claim 4 months(there's no way the hair grows that long in even 4 months), but you're now posting pictures of new growth/short hair whereas the one I just posted and you posted the fake before/after of- has long hair and shows none of what you're showing us in your previous post.
Why can't you answer the questions?
Why do you try to get away with using 3 of the same picture to show your early progress?
Why do you lie about time frames- we all know hair does not grow that fast in 3 months.
Why do you refuse to post pictures that we requested, and instead just kept posting the same pictures you've posted before? We now see, via the pictures on the company's website, that you indeed do have/use a comb-over. So I've just answered my own question..but I'm sure I'm not the only one who'd LOVE to hear/read your excuse.
Why do some of your "after" pictures show a fairly full crown of hair, when others do not?
Why is it that in various other forums your posts have been deleted or edited out and/or you've been banned? (which, as I said above..just happened again)Comment
-
Make Us Believe!
Comment
-
You have no understanding of how this lotion. Their arguments demonstrate inability and lack of knowledge of current products. Their knowledge is at the level of the sages of the caves.
Anyway ...Comment
-
So in other words...the stuff is crap...you have no answers because you were caught in so many lies.Comment
-
so your a caveman now jacob hahaha?
Comment
-
and habs your doing this product no favours when you will not post new all over scalp pictures only the old stuff.Comment
-
only the old stuff.?
doke, this picture taken today!
uffff! ... see nothing
Comment
-
hi hab you really needed to take a picture shot the same as first picture the same for the second as you cannot see the whole top and back of scalp in the second.
In other words pan out on that second shot?Comment
-
That first pic looks like wet hair, second dry. There might be some regrowth, like doke said you need to pan out to get the crown in the shot.
But even with that, cant compare wet/dry.
How about you wet your hair today and post pic panned out like doke said next to that first wet pic? SAME distance.
That doesn't sound hard does it? I'm hoping this is legit product.Comment
-
You do not see the difference at 4 months and 20 days?
A photo is outside and another next to a window. Even with differences of light I see interesting improvements.
Att,Comment
-
Habs now thats the front what about same distance above shot of crown? or is that still bald?Comment
Tweet
Comment