whats the problem with Gho??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by JJJJrS

    The amount of excuses you make for HASCI is ridiculous..

    Where are the 3-hair grafts in the petri dish genius?
    Of course where you always can find them:

    Either in section 1 or section 2 - depending on the "first in - first out" principle, idiot.

    Leave a comment:


  • JJJJrS
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    I don't know HOW OFTEN we discussed the purpose of the 3 sections in Gho's petri dishes - all I know it was very often. Section "3" is ONLY for the so-called "failed extraction" grafts!!
    The amount of excuses you make for HASCI is ridiculous..

    Where are the 3-hair grafts in the petri dish genius?

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    You're wrong here dear Im. Remember that she mailed this:
    "Ik moest inclusief instellen 75x boren voor 51 goede grafts. Dit waren 23 met 1 wortel, 16 met 2 wortel en 2 met 3 wortels"

    Yeah - and?

    We know in the meanwhile, that you don't even understand you native language, because there is not 1 single word which says, that the 3-hair grafts belong to section "3" in the petri dish - besides the fact, that we noticed a typo and/or wrong counting anyhow.

    The text just says how many 1-hair, 2-hair and 3-hair grafts she extracted and how many drills she made to get "51 goede grafts" - that's all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    I don't know HOW OFTEN we discussed the purpose of the 3 sections in Gho's petri dishes - all I know it was very often. Section "3" is ONLY for the so-called "failed extraction" grafts!!
    You're wrong here dear IM. Remember that she mailed this:

    Ik moest inclusief instellen 75x boren voor 51 goede grafts. Dit waren 23 met 1 wortel, 16 met 2 wortel en 2 met 3 wortels

    Leave a comment:


  • JJJJrS
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    By the way ...

    IF all the BS you claim about "Kristel is saying" would be true, then can you explain me and others please ...

    - for what was your whole "50 grafts test procedure" crap at all;

    - and why was Kristel willing to do one, if the "addmitted success rate" is much lower as claimed by HSCI??
    1. HASCI didn't complete any 50 graft test procedure. They gave us terrible photos that are impossible to analyse.

    2. You keep ignoring this issue, but do you think 80% of the hairs extracted during your procedure regenerated? Because I didn't see that at all for either you or gc.

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi

    Eh ? That's why they put them in the "3's" section. Not sure what you're implying or trying to say here ?
    I don't know HOW OFTEN we discussed the purpose of the 3 sections in Gho's petri dishes - all I know it was very often. Section "3" is ONLY for the so-called "failed extraction" grafts!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    And who says, BESIDES YOU and only YOU, that the "3 3's" in the "3" section of the petri dish were considered as "3-hair grafts" ????????????????
    Eh ? That's why they put them in the "3's" section. Not sure what you're implying or trying to say here ?

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi

    I don't know. You tell me. You saw yourself how only 3 3's where in the 50 graft test.
    And who says, BESIDES YOU and only YOU, that the "3 3's" in the "3" section of the petri dish were considered as "3-hair grafts" ????????????????

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    And after they understood the 1st 50 graft test was worthless because they hadn't shot 1 single good pre-op photo, they surely must have understood the importance of a good pre-op photo. I even mailed it to them how important it was (in case they hadn't figured it out, lol). And now we get to see 1 (just 1) pre-op photo's that's way below mediocre at best ? Why is that ? You tell me ..

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    By the way ...

    IF all the BS you claim about "Kristel is saying" would be true, then can you explain me and others please ...

    - for what was your whole "50 grafts test procedure" crap at all;

    - and why was Kristel willing to do one, if the "addmitted success rate" is much lower as claimed by HSCI??
    I don't know. You tell me. You saw yourself how only 3 3's where in the 50 graft test. If they knew they couldn't extract 3's from a guy who has just about average hair, then why would they agree to doing the test ? Wouldn't it make them look bad ? You tell me ..

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi

    I perfectly understand what she's saying though. She's kind of admitting that regrowth is nowhere near 80%, just like we saw in GC's case (where we saw 65% but that number was greatly skewed to the upside because of the failed extractions, hence it's most probably even lower than 50%).
    By the way ...

    IF all the BS you claim about "Kristel is saying" would be true, then can you explain me and others please ...

    - for what was your whole "50 grafts test procedure" crap at all;

    - and why was Kristel willing to do one, if the "addmitted success rate" is much lower as claimed by HSCI??

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by stayhopeful
    I plan on having GHO transplants and the Scarless FUE to densify the hairline region as a second procedure.. What do you all think?
    I think that if you even have as little as 10% confidence in Dr Nigams, you should wait and see how Tom's hair develops. If you don't have any confidence in him, yeah Gho is the way to go for sure (if you have the money). Just keep in mind that currently the regrowth percentage is still very much topic of debate (as you can see here) but regardless is still the best procedure out there at the moment.

    Leave a comment:


  • stayhopeful
    replied
    I plan on having GHO transplants and the Scarless FUE to densify the hairline region as a second procedure.. What do you all think?

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    No - because if you would, you wouldn't ask over and over again the same shit.



    That is just what YOU claim what she told you - or rather what you "think" what she told you; she told me recently on the phone that she is fully aware about the moron "Arashi", but she can't do anything about him. Sure, I can't prove what whe told me, but that's what she said.
    I can see you never have met Kristel. She's a VERY polite, respectful and kind woman, she would NEVER call anybody a moron, not even her worst enemy. In fact she wrote in one of her emails that she didn't like how people on these forums were insulting each other and making the discussions so personal (if you want to, I could quote that). Not sure who she could have been referring to ... Hmm ...

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi

    I perfectly understand what she's saying though.
    No - because if you would, you wouldn't ask over and over again the same shit.

    Originally posted by Arashi
    She's kind of admitting that regrowth is nowhere near 80%, just like we saw in GC's case (where it's most probably even lower than 50%).
    That is just what YOU claim what she told you - or rather what you "think" what she told you; she told me recently on the phone that she is fully aware about the moron "Arashi" who makes her always ridiculous on hair loss forums, but she can't do anything about him. Sure, I can't prove what whe told me, but that's what she said.

    Leave a comment:

Working...