whats the problem with Gho??

[Arashi]

At least I'm NOT the one who can see 3 3-hair grafts in a petri dish, just because one section in the petri dish is labled with "3" ... LOL

Ok.

[534623]

Nope, you're the one denying what you see in front of you...

At least I'm NOT the one who can see 3 3-hair grafts in a petri dish, just because one section in the petri dish is labled with "3" ... LOL

[didi]

Yeah - and? Where are the ANSWERS to my questions??

I don't think I will ever get them from and idiot like you who "organized" this useless test procedure, who until today still knows nothing about his "organized" test procedure.

its not arashis fault that we still dnt know sh1t abt test procedure, we(he) did everything possible to get to the bottom of this BS,

you cant do much when hasci is doing everything possible not to document this properly and hide things from public.

the test would bring them a lot of $$$, real prob is they cant do what they clam...

80% regeneration is flop, 2.5/2.0 hairs per graft on average is flop....

[Arashi]

Sorry, I'm neither the one who "organized" this idiotic test procedure, nor the one who performed it.

Nope, you're the one denying what you see in front of you, because it doesn't fit the reality you've created in your head.

[534623]

See above. And you couldn't understand why there were 22 singles and now it turns out it's even way worse: there are not 22 but 32 singles !

Yeah - exactly! And why don't you idiot ask all these questions your polite girlfriend Kristel?? Sorry, I'm neither the one who "organized" this idiotic test procedure, nor the one who performed it. I'm just the "observer", like every other user on these forums.

[Arashi]

Yeah - and? Where are the ANSWERS to my questions??

I don't think I will ever get them from and idiot like you who "organized" this useless test procedure, who until today still knows nothing about his "organized" test procedure.

Hehe. You are really something else IM ... I really don't understand your extreme fanboyism. Is it that hard to have at least SOME criticism towards your favorite doctor ? Do you really have to abandon all reason and sanity to keep defending him, even when you know you're not making any sense anymore ?

[534623]

Here you showed at least some reason, so we know you're capable of that: http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showpos...&postcount=716

Yeah - and? Where are the ANSWERS to my questions??

I don't think I will ever get them from and idiot like you who "organized" this useless test procedure, who until today still knows nothing about his "organized" test procedure.

[Arashi]

Yes, please. lol ... I would be surprised. Because even if you can SEE more 3-hair grafts in a given area (and even if a very very small area) - it doesn't mean that these 3-hair grafts are "extractable" for HST extractions (wired graft configuration, small needle etc). Sometimes such grafts are even "tricky" for normal FUE extractions.

See above. And you couldn't understand why there were 22 singles and now it turns out it's even way worse: there are not 22 but 32 singles !

[didi]

iron man - looks like you are the last man left who believes in HST, time to switch sides

failed extractions skew things up in Ghos favour, How many failed extractions did James Bald have? Did they put those failed extractions in petri?


im starting to question if hst gets any real regeneration, if im to bet id say true regeneration rate is closer to '0' than it is to 80%..

[534623]

LOL, Shall I look up your quote where even you said that you didn't understand why there were ONLY 2 3's in the test ?

Yes, please. lol ... I would be surprised. Because even if you can SEE more 3-hair grafts in a given area (and even if a very very small area) - it doesn't mean that these 3-hair grafts are "extractable" for HST extractions (wired graft configuration, small needle etc). Sometimes such grafts are even "tricky" for normal FUE extractions.

[Arashi]

Here you showed at least some reason, so we know you're capable of that: http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showpos...&postcount=716

[Arashi]

Yeah - and? How big was the test area? 3 m² or 5?

LOL, Shall I look up your quote where even you said that you didn't understand why there were ONLY 2 3's in the test ?

[534623]

Yup ! Remember how those numbers she gave didn't add up (23+16+2 =41, not 51). And remember how we figured that she must have had the number of 3's wrong and that it must be 12 since this guy's hair is very very normal/average and he had a lot of 3's in donor ? Now look at the petridish photo I posted before ! the correct numbers are:

1's: 33
2's: 16
3's: 2

(well petridish shows 2x 15 and 3x3 to be precize, they might have moved 1 from the 2 to 3 section)

Anyway, that's an average of only 1.35 hair per graft. That's even way worse than the 1.5 I predicted earlier.

Yeah - and? How big was the test area? 3 m² or 5?

[JJJJrS]

Of course where you always can find them:

Either in section 1 or section 2 - depending on the "first in - first out" principle, idiot.

Please, tell me where these 3-hair grafts are:

http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/13188018/img/13188018.jpg

I see 1-hair grafts in the 1 section, 2-hair grafts in the 2 section.

Where are the 3-hair grafts outside the 3 section. Does your ridicolous, delusional Gho-bias make you see things that don't exist?

[Arashi]

besides the fact, that we noticed a typo and/or wrong counting anyhow.

Yup ! Remember how those numbers she gave didn't add up (23+16+2 =41, not 51). And remember how we figured that she must have had the number of 3's wrong and that it must be 12 since this guy's hair is very very normal/average and he had a lot of 3's in donor ? Now look at the petridish photo I posted before ! the correct numbers are:

1's: 33
2's: 16
3's: 2

(well petridish shows 2x 15 and 3x3 to be precize, they might have moved 1 from the 2 to 3 section)

Anyway, that's an average of only 1.35 hair per graft. That's even way worse than the 1.5 I predicted earlier.