There's a big problem with looking at it from that standpoint. Someone could entirely split multi-hair follicular units, and claim donor regeneration. For example, if a 3-hair follicular unit is extracted and 2 hairs "regenerate" in the donor and 1 hair yields in the recipient, then according to HASCI's and Iron_Man's logic, you have total donor regeneration. Or if a graft is transected, regrows in the donor but is not viable for transplantation, than we have another case of "donor regeneration." Obviously, in both cases you have zero hair multiplication and the "regeneration rate" is a meaningless figure.
The only thing that matters is the multiplication rate and you can only determine such a figure if you analyze both the donor and recipient of a small procedure. Otherwise, what I described above is a very real, very plausible explanation for what HASCI is doing.
The only thing that matters is the multiplication rate and you can only determine such a figure if you analyze both the donor and recipient of a small procedure. Otherwise, what I described above is a very real, very plausible explanation for what HASCI is doing.
Comment