Because I haven't seen a single CLEAR evidence so far.
I'm convinced Dr. Nigam is a legit hair surgeon in the sense that he was licensed to do this in India so I think it's great we get to ask him these questions because when was the last time you got to go on a forum and fire questions at a doctor like this?
I don't think surgery is necessarily the right option for me, but if Dr. Nigam can show that he is doing this kind of cutting edge surgery to the satisfaction of some of these people who already had a HT then I would seriously consider going to him for HM.
When I saw that last round of GC photos I knew I was going to get something done finally even if it was just flying to Amsterdam to get the crown filled in because with the reduced scarring and regeneration I just couldn't see a lot of downsides to it in principle, and yet I still haven't flown over there to see Dr. Gho yet so does that mean that Dr. Gho isn't legit or does it just mean I have a lot of concerns with how someone redesigns my hairline?
I just can't believe that there is still some guyz who are saying some shit about Dr.Nigam... This guy is respectful, even if he'd not find the way to cure us MBP sufferers, he's trying. He's spending his free time to awnser as better as he can to everyone even to people like iron man. I would be happy to see Dr.Gho doing the same thing...but no he's to busy to make some money
it happens to have a hotel businness and guess what happens in all this shit visitors tripadvisor booking.c om sites etc. there are other business rivals of the area that have travelers to say bad reviews , it is scewed thing, all for the money ,......
respect to Dr Nigam
Originally posted by bibz
I just can't believe that there is still some guyz who are saying some shit about Dr.Nigam... This guy is respectful, even if he'd not find the way to cure us MBP sufferers, he's trying. He's spending his free time to awnser as better as he can to everyone even to people like iron man. I would be happy to see Dr.Gho doing the same thing...but no he's to busy to make some money
The key point which you conveniently ignored to suit your agenda is the fact that we mentioned the waiting time to see how things pan out and then make a wise decision. Nobody has said anything about conclusive results and going forward with the procedure.
Pick your battles dude. While your knowledge of hair and follicles is amazing, your semantics and social skills are severely lacking.
So, you say you WAIT how things pan out??
I wonder whose social skills are severely lacking ....
Last edited by Winston; 06-12-2013, 02:53 PM.
Reason: Inappropriate comments removed
This one of the best known cases dr gho worked on..5100+..the highest number of grafts we have seen from gho clinic.
took almost 3 years and 3 procedures and he his donor come to an end.
This result is pretty disappointing for a procedure that claims to multiply hairs. I have seen Lorenzo and Erdogan and Doganay put out more impressive results via FUE.
Why? Did you count his 5000 grafts on his former slick bald head?
And did you use high power magnification to examine his donor area for any scars after 5000 grafts??
If he is splitting hairs and regenerating the donor, then what's stopping him from putting together a far thicker end result? In theory, if there really was regeneration going on, he could keep doing this over and over again until he has a lot of density on top.
But after three procedures, all he has is light coverage on a very high hairline...the goal is to get hair on top after all.
But after three procedures, all he has is light coverage on a very high hairline...the goal is to get hair on top after all.
I heard recently Spencers show. They mentioned that hair transplant doctors out there even transplant hairs from the top (crown area etc - meaning not permanent areas) to the front area - to get any grafts at all for transplantation and to convince naive idiots like you thereafter.
And yet you avoid the question, after all this talk of HAIR MULTIPLICATION and STEM CELLS, end of the day, the patient has a mediocre result after three procedures and a very high hairline. FUE would have given him the exact same thing. Dumbass.
If Gho was truly multiplying hairs, we'd see epic results well above and beyond what traditional transplants provide.
And yet you avoid the question, after all this talk of HAIR MULTIPLICATION and STEM CELLS, end of the day, the patient has a mediocre result after three procedures and a very high hairline. FUE would have given him the exact same thing. Dumbass.
If Gho was truly multiplying hairs, we'd see epic results well above and beyond what traditional transplants provide.
still nobody answered my question: why dont the HT doctors use the hair on the sides of our heads as donor area?
Below a 33-year-old AGA patient (its, of course, NOT damielmillo!!):
10 years before, the guy had a full head of hair and,
of course, not such severe thinning in his donor area
Transplanting such a guy in his 20s, would have given him only a temporary benefit in the (balding) recipient area.
damielmillos
Comment