CB-03-01 - When will it come to market? Will it be a stand alone treatment?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Henkeh91
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 127

    #46
    Does CB-03-01 promote new hair growth or just keeps the remaining ones? I guess I'm an norwood 5 or so when it's being released

    Comment

    • hellouser
      Senior Member
      • May 2012
      • 4419

      #47
      Originally posted by Henkeh91
      Does CB-03-01 promote new hair growth or just keeps the remaining ones? I guess I'm an norwood 5 or so when it's being released
      We don't know yet, but cosmo's release stated users of CB at 1% noticed hair cant went up from about 75 hairs/cm2 to about 109 hairs/cm2, an increase of density of 50%.

      Thats pretty fvcking awesome especially considering it has no sexual side effects.

      We'll know more soon to come but if you really want to get on the CB gravy train you'll need to order it in raw form from Kane and make the vehicle yourself. Its not hard, but it can be a pain in the ass.

      Comment

      • burtandernie
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2012
        • 1563

        #48
        This cant come soon enough and this is what I have all my hopes pinned onto. The only proven method we have so far that stops MPB cold is stopping androgens such as in castrated men. Nothing else has ever been proven to stop MPB.
        This could be the first treatment that is actually safe and most importantly actually fights both T and DHT hopefully lowering them down to near castrate levels. If it can pull this off I think MPB changes to a preventable disease if you got the money

        Comment

        • hellouser
          Senior Member
          • May 2012
          • 4419

          #49
          Originally posted by burtandernie
          This cant come soon enough and this is what I have all my hopes pinned onto. The only proven method we have so far that stops MPB cold is stopping androgens such as in castrated men. Nothing else has ever been proven to stop MPB.
          This could be the first treatment that is actually safe and most importantly actually fights both T and DHT hopefully lowering them down to near castrate levels. If it can pull this off I think MPB changes to a preventable disease if you got the money
          No chance in hell CB will be too expensive to purchase, its going to have to be about the same price or less than Finasteride. Its a topical treatment, thus a gigantic pain in the ass of daily usage. I'd rather take a pill without Finasteride side effects.

          But yes, CB is supposed to be 4 times as effective as finasteride. That 40% increase in density from the cosmo trials would show 4X more effective is about right since Finasteride *can* give you 10-20% increased density.

          Comment

          • burtandernie
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2012
            • 1563

            #50
            Yeah hopefully its not outrageously priced. The power to stop mpb for decades topically with no sides? Sounds good to me. I heard there was a chance it could be used once or twice weekly instead of daily but that might be hoping for too much. I would just be happy to see this see the light of day. We have like 3 or 4 super good topical treatments that got scrapped like RU among others.

            Comment

            • hellouser
              Senior Member
              • May 2012
              • 4419

              #51
              Originally posted by burtandernie
              Yeah hopefully its not outrageously priced. The power to stop mpb for decades topically with no sides? Sounds good to me. I heard there was a chance it could be used once or twice weekly instead of daily but that might be hoping for too much. I would just be happy to see this see the light of day. We have like 3 or 4 super good topical treatments that got scrapped like RU among others.
              I think the patients from the Cosmo trials were applying it once or twice weekly and achieved those results. We still don't know what vehicle they used however it did state 'OL/PG' which should mea 'OLEYL/PROPYLENE GLYCOL' (a standard cosmetic vehicle)

              Comment

              • samdee
                Member
                • Jan 2013
                • 72

                #52
                Originally posted by Pate
                Clinical trials are already well advanced, they only just started in the US but earlier trials happened in Europe. The big downer for CB is that they are focusing on acne first, which seems bizarre since the acne market is already well supplied with viable treatments while MPB of course isn't.

                The other downer is the indicative timeline keeps slipping. I think 2017 is a realistic goal for market now.

                But in terms of efficacy and sides it's looking great. Should be a big improvement on Fin with no systemic sides, and only needs to be used once or max twice a week. And while trials are slow, at least Cosmo is making progress and getting deals done. They are also a profitable company in their own right so no worries about them going out of business if they meet delays.

                That's GREAT. As long as they are working on stuff. Things are happening and people are getting smarter. Although in this direct respect it's a bit of a bummer, these steps have all sorts on indirect positive outcomes.

                I say, this industry is creating a great foundation for itself.

                Comment

                • Troy
                  Member
                  • Aug 2012
                  • 73

                  #53
                  Originally posted by Dan26
                  All we really know from Cosmo is that they have decided to trial an anhydrous vehicle at a 5% concentration. People think it may be an Olelyl Alchohol / PG solution, but we wont really be sure until Cosmo releases it. Pretty sure Isopropanal/PG would not work at all. It's a big ass molecule! I'm trying it with DMI/DMSO as they are unreal for penetration, but again, none of us will really know until we try and we see everyone results from all the different vehicles

                  If we get it working properly, it should outperform fin and RU. When they used it with iontopheresis I think only once or twice a week, the results were impressive.
                  There this guy Alfie that is/was getting results from ethanol (50)/ PG (50) vehicle with CB.

                  CB is not a big ass molecule - Molecular Weight 402.52
                  chemBlink provides information about CAS # 19608-29-8, CB-03-01, 21-Hydroxy-17-(1-oxopropoxy)pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione. An open source of chemical information available to the public online since 2005.


                  DMI/DMSO sounds good for dissolving the powder, but doubt you'll need a strong penetration enhancer like DMSO!

                  I also believe that CB should outperform RU and Fin as it takes care of androgens and inflamation...and as a bonus should not have systemic side effets!

                  Anyway good luck Dan

                  Comment

                  • Troy
                    Member
                    • Aug 2012
                    • 73

                    #54
                    Originally posted by hellouser
                    I think the patients from the Cosmo trials were applying it once or twice weekly and achieved those results. We still don't know what vehicle they used however it did state 'OL/PG' which should mea 'OLEYL/PROPYLENE GLYCOL' (a standard cosmetic vehicle)
                    I think the once or twice a week study was done with iontophoresis!

                    Comment

                    • burtandernie
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2012
                      • 1563

                      #55
                      What is iontophoresis? I mean is it some kind of sophisticated delivery vehicle that is too expensive for the actual real product?

                      Comment

                      • Troy
                        Member
                        • Aug 2012
                        • 73

                        #56
                        Originally posted by burtandernie
                        What is iontophoresis? I mean is it some kind of sophisticated delivery vehicle that is too expensive for the actual real product?
                        Iontophoresis, also called electromotive drug administration (EMDA), is a technique using a small electric charge to deliver a medicine or other chemical through the skin.[1] It is basically an injection without the needle. The technical description of this process is a non-invasive method of propelling high concentrations of a charged substance, normally a medication or bioactive agent, transdermally by repulsive electromotive force using a small electrical charge applied to an iontophoretic chamber containing a similarly charged active agent and its vehicle. One or two chambers are filled with a solution containing an active ingredient and its solvent, also called the vehicle. The positively charged chamber, called the anode, will repel a positively charged chemical, whereas the negatively charged chamber, called the cathode, will repel a negatively charged chemical into the skin.
                        It might be hard to use this at home

                        Comment

                        • burtandernie
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2012
                          • 1563

                          #57
                          Yeah that sounds a little out of reach, but if it works that well maybe someday we will get some kind of dumbed down version of this for home use.
                          Hopefully they can find a good topical vehicle to replace this that works almost as good, because this whole treatment and lots of others depend on a good vehicle. You would think given the amount of companies faced with topical vehicle problems there would be some good ones already studied.

                          Comment

                          • chemhead
                            Junior Member
                            • May 2011
                            • 11

                            #58
                            You know for us, iontophoresis is really not out of reach. I use an iontophoresis device I made on a daily basis (not for my hair). It wouldn't be difficult to make another device specifically to deliver CB to the scalp. I've got a question for any of you. I've been using Fin for about 4 years now and I've decided that I just don't want to tolerate the sides anymore. Fin works very well for me.. stops all loss and thickens at the proper dosage, but I have no libido, it's difficult for me to build muscle without it quickly wasting away (it's A LOT of work), I'm cognitively just "not there". I don't really dream anymore.. don't remember the last dream I had. I usually just sleep and that's it.. always tired. I've also cycled on and off Fin multiple times and relieved all my sides, so I'm not worried about any so-called "post-fin" symptoms. Anyway, I've ordered my first batch of RU a few days ago. Do any of you have any experiences with using ONLY RU, having dropped fin or dut because of sides? I'd like to know if anyone had equivalent or better results with RU, minus the sides of fin/dut. Obviously, I'll have to try for myself to truly know, but it would be nice to hear others' experiences. If RU works for me, I will start synthesizing it myself (I have my own lab + equipment). For now, though, I'm going to determine if it works. I'd also like to synthesize CB, but that will be down the road and it's a lot more involved than RU, due to it's steroidal structure. Any thoughts appreciated.

                            Comment

                            • burtandernie
                              Senior Member
                              • Nov 2012
                              • 1563

                              #59
                              This cant come soon enough because I am happy to keep my hair, but I really dont want to touch propecia.

                              Comment

                              • chemhead
                                Junior Member
                                • May 2011
                                • 11

                                #60
                                burtandernie, I wouldn't discourage you from trying finasteride. There are some people that don't experience sides and if it works.. even better. I honestly envy the people that get good results from fin with no sides. Dosage on fin is a little weird for me.. I've discovered that too little obviously doesn't help my hair enough, but that too much also doesn't. I have a very small window where the dosage is optimal. Beyond it, scalp gets itchy, my hair gets thinner, dry, and starts falling out.. skin gets red/irritated. Beneath it, hair is more oily, thinner, and scalp gets itchy. The negative non-hair related sides increase dose-dependently... unfortunately. It would be nice to have a small window for those to go away too :/.

                                I pulverize my fin and use a pharmaceutical balance to measure out my dose every day in order to keep myself in that "window". I really hope RU works for me without sides, though. I've got a lot to be optimistic about because it seems to work well for a lot of people. I just know if it does work, a huge burden will be lifted for me. Fin has a hug effect on my overall energy and it makes it really difficult to work out... or really do anything. I'm amazed that I manage to gain anything. If RU were to work for me, I would honestly feel like I was cheating life. Feeling like shit has been kind of the norm since I've been on fin. It's incredibly refreshing when I take a break from it.. I feel alive... I actually get hard looking at girls lol... can't wait to replace this shit.

                                Comment

                                Working...