Hair loss Is preventable and reversible. A must Read!

[25 going on 65]

Your a norwood 2 because your prostate is being treated with a medication that shrinks it. Your dilemma will be sexual disfunction. BTW massages hardly combat a tight scalp im looking for more effect wat to alleviate this tension. Also if you use rogaine a vasodilator(originally made for blood pressure to increase blood flow) and propecia (originally made to shrink the prostate) its kind of funny to argue my theories when you are treating the very fundamental problems I just explained.

Finasteride doesn't treat hair loss by shrinking your prostate. Decrease in prostate volume is one result of taking finasteride, but the hair retention/growth effect is from the drug binding to the 5a-reductase enzyme. This blocks testosterone from binding to the enzyme and forming DHT (which, btw, doesn't require ejaculation to form in the body, despite what you implied before). DHT is the androgen responsible for miniaturizing hair follicles. Less DHT in your bloodstream means less DHT miniaturizing your follicles, which means slowing, stopping or reversing genetic pattern alopecia in most males.
Sexual dysfunction occurs in fewer than 5% of men who use 1 mg finasteride based on studies done in the last 15 years. I haven't experienced this side effect and neither have most users, including people who have used higher than recommended dosages for 15+ years.

I won't even get into all the other incorrect statements you have posted in this thread.

[mpb47]

I am attempting to make clarifications but more importantly to stimulate good thought as too how we can test ways to cushion the scalp and balance the equation of input and output of nutrients via ejaculation. Don't get caught up in assuming the male reproductinve system has no correlation with MPB that would be absurd. Male Hormones, prostate medications...dont be ignorant there is a very apparent link and with some adding and substracting you can see why. Ejaculating too often is only a measure of the output and input of what is lost. So then you can ejaculate as frequently as you want as long as you replace what is lost however for most of us this is just not the case.

It's not a causal link link but an indirect one. Look on pubmed, I believe it was the army who did that study. Ejaculation does not cause baldness, but rather DHT causes balding and it also drives men to ejaculate. DHT is going to make you bald whether you act on the drive or not.

[jpm]

There seems to be a surplus of trolls recently...can anyone offer some unfounded and proof-less reason to why?

Any reason will suffice, it can be crap for all I care. After all, thats what these trolls are doing

[2020]

Tight scalps account for women hair loss during childbirth when berthing a male because of a heightened amount of DHT during pregnancy when the male genitalia is formed.

That is not why women lose hair during pregnancy.... OMFG YOU ARE SO ****ING STUPID....

I already proved your theory wrong a page ago. Why are you still here!?

[Davey Jones]

C'mon, beatinghairloss, what's the angle? All this stuff is demonstratably untrue. Why are you here? Trying to work on your debate skills? Picking a completely indefensible position is quite the challenge.

In fact, I got $10 says that's what's up here.*

*Any internet bets I make are entirely fictional and for entertainment purposes only.

[beatinghairloss]

that's why it's called male PATTERN hair loss..... you're a ****ing idiot.

So then? Why do women not bald in the same way that men do? I would have to admit that your theory could be correct if women were exposed the exact same genetic predisposition as we are. But they're not they don't have DHT in the amount we do because they did not have a prostate. Tight scalps account for women hair loss during childbirth when berthing a male because of a heightened amount of DHT during pregnancy when the male genitalia is formed. genetics then can only be associated with male pattern baldness if there is one thing contributing but another is not your theory does not make sense because we are all exposed to the same genes if it was simply genetics then women wouldbals the same way we do.

[2020]

Hold on a sec you think per follicle each one has a different genetic tolerance to DHT and that they all happen at different times yet seem to take a very common start at the temples and crown. LOL this is hilarious maybe these forum really do bread ignorance.

that's why it's called male PATTERN hair loss..... you're a ****ing idiot.

[beatinghairloss]

right! The number of "bad" follicles is in your genetics. It's not something that can be changed with "scalp massages"...

Hold on a sec you think per follicle each one has a different genetic tolerance to DHT and that they all happen at different times yet seem to take a very common start at the temples and crown. LOL this is hilarious maybe these forum really do bread ignorance.

[beatinghairloss]

I am a Norwood 2 because I paid attention to sound science and got on proven treatments.
Same goes for 2020 and Scorpion if I'm not mistaken.
If we'd tried to "circulate" our way out of our own genetic code, we would probably look like Nicholas Cage by now.

Your a norwood 2 because your prostate is being treated with a medication that shrinks it. Your dilemma will be sexual disfunction. BTW massages hardly combat a tight scalp im looking for more effect wat to alleviate this tension. Also if you use rogaine a vasodilator(originally made for blood pressure to increase blood flow) and propecia (originally made to shrink the prostate) its kind of funny to argue my theories when you are treating the very fundamental problems I just explained.

[25 going on 65]

Ignorant fools I should have listened to the warnings you guys got it all figured out good luck with your balding heads.

I am a Norwood 2 because I paid attention to sound science and got on proven treatments.
Same goes for 2020 if I'm not mistaken.
If we'd tried to "circulate" our way out of our own genetic code, we would probably look like Nicholas Cage by now.

[2020]

All this proves is that once a follicle is bad its allways bad.

right! The number of "bad" follicles is in your genetics. It's not something that can be changed with "scalp massages"...

[beatinghairloss]

Ignorant fools I should have listened to the warnings you guys got it all figured out good luck with your balding heads.

[beatinghairloss]

The follicle is full of DHT we already know that if you take a bad follicle and move it I would not expect it to grow any better thats your proof?

All this proves is that once a follicle is bad its allways bad.

[2020]

I have 200 people and counting fully anazlized and wanted to share that each of them the tightness of the scalp shows an identical pattern to their hair loss but no worries I will try to publish my research soon.

and I told you: what makes you think that it's not the other way around - the skin does not become tighter as follicles shrink?

I am sure I wont make a dime but hopefully you all catch it on some local news channel as I am sure it will only get one day and 2 minutes of run time. People could care less they want a pill to solve all their problems and you all will be dead and gone before that day comes. Good luck

you gave up because I proved your theory wrong. Yes, good luck trying to pull this crap on some other forum

[beatinghairloss]

from the link I gave you before:



what now?

The follicle is full of DHT we already know that if you take a bad follicle and move it I would not expect it to grow any better thats your proof?