i honestly havent looked into this very much because I already know im right, but here is an example of a study I just came across:
just fyi, this is what a study looks like. All those little numbers and graphs are called DATA... pretty arent they?
There were over a thousand test subjects. Doctors had a hypothesis, that they thought Testosterone was responsible for libido in men, but didnt have any solid data to prove it.
So they set up a study. they set up test parameters, conducted the study and looked at the data. the data strongly supported their hypothesis that Testosterone IS responsible for libido. Nowhere in this study is DHT even mentioned. You would think maybe if DHT were so crucial for libido that they might have mentioned that?
just fyi, this is what a study looks like. All those little numbers and graphs are called DATA... pretty arent they?

There were over a thousand test subjects. Doctors had a hypothesis, that they thought Testosterone was responsible for libido in men, but didnt have any solid data to prove it.
So they set up a study. they set up test parameters, conducted the study and looked at the data. the data strongly supported their hypothesis that Testosterone IS responsible for libido. Nowhere in this study is DHT even mentioned. You would think maybe if DHT were so crucial for libido that they might have mentioned that?
Comment