Hair Science Institute: Another Scam?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HairRobinHood
    Inactive
    • Feb 2010
    • 74

    #46
    Originally posted by Dutch_Dude
    one thing i didn't understand though. they said they cannot put the hairs so close to each other as mother nature, but i wonder if other surgeons could do it better. that you go to HSI for the first few operations, and to make it more thick, have another very small transplant at like bijan feriduni or hasson & wong or something like that...
    Due to the fact, that HST grafts (FU’s) are pretty thin, due to the use of just 0.5 or 0.6 mm inner diameter special needles, each HST graft needs a so-called “recovery zone” in the skin. That means, there is a need for the place for the expected regenerating REMAINDER of the follicle tissue of the vertically transected HST-grafts (grafts, WITHOUT the surrounding entire tissue of an “intact” hair follicle). And therefore, if the whole transplantation process is carried out in the same area all at one time, there COULD be a good chance that not all the transplants will "take" and also scar tissue may form. I mentioned something about this topic in some previous posts here?

    Secondly, if HT docs too many closely packed-together grafts transplant in the recipient site (in general), this COULD end up not successful due to death of follicles due to limited blood supply, among some other reasons. In other words - "There is more grass for each cow" if you do not transplant grafts too closely in the same area all at one time/procedure (it’s more safe).

    On the other hand, concerning “density”, I really wonder myself about a specific part of the following:

    -----------------------------------
    Hair Stem Cell Injection

    The Hair Stem Cell Transplant [HST] is the result of continuous research by HSI. One of the next steps will be Hair Stem Cell Injection (HaarStamcel Injectie&#174, not a new transplant method but a quantum leap forward with HST. This injection method has achieved very satisfactory results in practice. Thanks in part to the quality of the results, this method can be expected to be officially launched in the near future.

    The difference

    Up to the removal of the hair stem cells to be transplanted, the technique is the same as HST. The major difference lies in the method of implantation. With HST, the stem cells are "planted" in tiny holes made in the restoration area with a needle. The holes fill with a droplet of blood, which ultimately leads to sealing and healing of the wound. With Hair Stem Cell Injection, the stem cells are injected directly into the skin without prepared holes. This means the following advantages:

    · Higher density: now the hair stem cells can be implanted even more closely together. With HST, the implantation spacing is 0.2-0.3 mm, while with injection the spacing is 0-0.1 mm.

    · Faster healing: with HST, healing was already fast (1 to 2 days); with the injection method, there is essentially no recovery time in the restoration area because there are no wounds.

    · Even greater precision: Thanks to the refinement of the injection method, the precision of the method is unsurpassed.

    · Ideal for burn wounds: scar tissue from burn wounds has poor blood circulation. But the injection method does not require blood for healing, simply because there are essentially no wounds to require healing.

    Source: http://www.hasci.com
    -----------------------------------

    Spacing is just 0-0,1 mm ??

    I really wonder if this is just a typo mistake ?

    Within some videos on their website (e.g. the "Bridget Maasland" or "Igli reportage" video), there you can clearly see where they INJECT HST-grafts with injection tools (similar to a syringe). But even with such tools, it is practically IMPOSSIBLE to implant HST grafts so closely!
    So I guess they are talking here about the injection of in laboratories CULTURED hair follicle CELLS. Because this would be the only way to implant "follicles" so closely.

    What do you think ?

    Comment

    • RichardDawkins
      Inactive
      • Jan 2011
      • 895

      #47
      Well other then my banned Pre Poster, i am very very sceptic about Gho. At HS there is actually one user who is enrolled in Ari studies.

      But there a no Gho patients around and this is strange. So unless we can see clear proof i say ignore him

      Comment

      • NeedHairASAP
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2011
        • 1410

        #48
        Well Hello Hello old friend

        Comment

        • 2020
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 1527

          #49
          Originally posted by NeedHairASAP
          Well Hello Hello old friend
          why are you bumping this crap?

          Comment

          • UK_
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2011
            • 2744

            #50
            Dawkins is long gone.

            Comment

            Working...