Originally posted by Highlander
a) Anything past a NW1 is essentially considered hair loss. The "definition" of a mature hairline is very different from that of the Norwood Scale. The Norwood Scale represents a scale of Male Pattern Baldness. It can not be said that past NW3 is officially "hair loss". Anything past NW1 is hair loss by definition.
Mature hairlines are typically correlated with age and a lack of the typical M-shape present in people suffering from MPB. In other words, you'll often see very old people with hair that maybe would be considered NW2.5ish, but if you look at their actually hairline you'll notice that it's a lot more rounded than that of a NW3, where the recession is deep and pronounced. Theirs tends to bend around smoothly.
b) All hair restoration doctors will give a hair transplant on a NW1 or under. The eligibility of someone to undergo a HT is a combination of age, family history, aggressiveness of hair loss, the donor hair, and effectiveness of any current medication being taken by the patient.
Tracy is literally high on her own ignorance that she refuses to actually listen to what leading doctors are saying, nor does she read any of the studies relating to the subject (though she claims to do so).
Right now you need to look at how to stop hair loss. Then get on the appropriate meds and wait about 12-18 months to determine their effectiveness, whether you have sides, and whether this is something you'd be willing to continue for life. If all of that is fine then you are fine to get a hair transplant.
And I'll gladly prove Tracy wrong right now. Go and look on the website of Rahal, Feriduni, Feller, or Keser. Go and google them right now. I will bet you they all have examples of hair transplants on people lower than NW3.
Is Tracy really having us believe that these doctors are unethical?
Really Tracy, go **** yourself. You cause more harm than good on this forum. You come on here and tell a NW2.5, 18 year old kid that he "only has a mature hairline and to not do anything"... and lo and behold he's back six months later NW3, upset, and desperately trying to fix his situation.
You are cancer. Just leave this forum now. You're an uneducated fool.
Mature hairlines are typically correlated with age and a lack of the typical M-shape present in people suffering from MPB. In other words, you'll often see very old people with hair that maybe would be considered NW2.5ish, but if you look at their actually hairline you'll notice that it's a lot more rounded than that of a NW3, where the recession is deep and pronounced. Theirs tends to bend around smoothly.
b) All hair restoration doctors will give a hair transplant on a NW1 or under. The eligibility of someone to undergo a HT is a combination of age, family history, aggressiveness of hair loss, the donor hair, and effectiveness of any current medication being taken by the patient.
Tracy is literally high on her own ignorance that she refuses to actually listen to what leading doctors are saying, nor does she read any of the studies relating to the subject (though she claims to do so).
Right now you need to look at how to stop hair loss. Then get on the appropriate meds and wait about 12-18 months to determine their effectiveness, whether you have sides, and whether this is something you'd be willing to continue for life. If all of that is fine then you are fine to get a hair transplant.
And I'll gladly prove Tracy wrong right now. Go and look on the website of Rahal, Feriduni, Feller, or Keser. Go and google them right now. I will bet you they all have examples of hair transplants on people lower than NW3.
Is Tracy really having us believe that these doctors are unethical?
Really Tracy, go **** yourself. You cause more harm than good on this forum. You come on here and tell a NW2.5, 18 year old kid that he "only has a mature hairline and to not do anything"... and lo and behold he's back six months later NW3, upset, and desperately trying to fix his situation.
You are cancer. Just leave this forum now. You're an uneducated fool.

Comment