For the morons who think that NW0 looks strange on older men...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Morbo
    replied
    Originally posted by yeahyeahyeah
    Everyone looks better with a good set of hair.

    So your point is flawed.
    That was not his point and that wasn't your logic.

    You were trying to proof that one old guy with unusual big hair is somehow the golden standard and ultimate proof that old people with big hair will always look better, where BigThinker countered that by saying that by that logic one man like Vin Diesel would somehow be the ultimate proof that bald men are somehow better looking than 'hairy' ones.

    You can say "Everyone looks better with a good set of hair", but your (rather desperate) example simply does not substantiate that.

    Leave a comment:


  • yeahyeahyeah
    replied
    Originally posted by BigThinker
    This is just as stupid as the posts that use individuals to show how bald can look good (Vin Diesel, Bruce Willis, etc.).
    Everyone looks better with a good set of hair.

    So your point is flawed.

    Leave a comment:


  • greatjob!
    replied
    So you found some examples of old people with perfect hair, so I guess this justifies your unhealthy delusional obsession with your hairloss ruining your life?

    Leave a comment:


  • capitan
    replied
    Originally posted by BigThinker
    This is just as stupid as the posts that use individuals to show how bald can look good (Vin Diesel, Bruce Willis, etc.).
    + 1

    Leave a comment:


  • Morbo
    replied
    Tbf David Lynch is one of the strangest directors in Hollywood with or without his hair.

    And yes, what BigThinker said.

    Leave a comment:


  • akai
    replied
    Having a full head of hair doesn't look ridiculous. Yes, it's not common for a guy that old to have hair that thick, but do you think he or anyone else would choose balding?

    Leave a comment:


  • BigThinker
    replied
    This is just as stupid as the posts that use individuals to show how bald can look good (Vin Diesel, Bruce Willis, etc.).

    Leave a comment:


  • whatsgoingon
    replied
    i love it. "if someone was bald he'd lose his signature look." But obviously if he was bald his "signature look" would be bald. I guess it depends, are you saying he lost his hair as this look was established or lost his hair before he had an established look.


    But that's all semantics. I don't think it looks strange, just out of place. Which I guess can be described as strange, strange is a very ambiguous term. Strange could be also out of the norm. So I'll settle with my final definition as out of the norm.

    And sorry if this came off abrasive or too direct, just a bit tired. Also everyone whines a lot over semantics. But that's not you, just seems to be the theme this week on the forum. So I'm possibly just in an annoyed mood.

    Leave a comment:


  • ccmethinning
    replied
    I honestly think Reagan's hair looks ridiculous. I truly believe that a thick NW1 on a man in his 70s looks unnatural.

    Leave a comment:


  • fred970
    replied
    There is no NW0. The scale starts at 1.

    Leave a comment:


  • For the morons who think that NW0 looks strange on older men...

    David Lynch:





    Imagine if he was bald, he would lose his signature look.

    Ronald Raegen:



    Handsome.
Working...