Tweet
I consulted with a dozen different HT doctors (basically the top ones in Turkey and the top ones in my country, Spain) and after reviewing my case, they all agreed that I was a very good candidate for HT based of my loss pattern and the health of my donor area.
All of them minus one, one that told me that I wasn't a good candidate and that HT not only wouldn't work but that it'd accelerate the loss of my native hair and I'd end up much worse than now... He says that not only my transplanted hair wouldn't grow but that the native hair would fall due to shock loss.
Is this reasoning scientifically sound? How come all the other ones agree on doing it but this one is so adamant against it?
At the moment I prefer not to name the one that told me not to do it, in order to avoid comments like "oh, he's a quack, look at this particular experience from this user". All I'm saying is that all the Turkish surgeons consulted all considered according to this forum as the best ones.
All of them minus one, one that told me that I wasn't a good candidate and that HT not only wouldn't work but that it'd accelerate the loss of my native hair and I'd end up much worse than now... He says that not only my transplanted hair wouldn't grow but that the native hair would fall due to shock loss.
Is this reasoning scientifically sound? How come all the other ones agree on doing it but this one is so adamant against it?
At the moment I prefer not to name the one that told me not to do it, in order to avoid comments like "oh, he's a quack, look at this particular experience from this user". All I'm saying is that all the Turkish surgeons consulted all considered according to this forum as the best ones.