Just thought about this for some time,
here are some facts, so lets look at some raw numbers
-NW6s lost half of their hair and that's about 80-100 000 hairs(35-40 000 FUs),
-most of these guys have weak donor hair, sometimes it even thinning, but lets say they are able to extract 6000 grafts
-they say you need 50% of your original density to have illusion of hair, 6 000 grafts is not even 20% of original density
-even if you add body hair its still impossible to reach 50% density(17-20 000 grafts), besides we all know how bad BHT can turn out, poor growth, aesthetics, high prices
-nw6 can easily spend $100 000+ and still be considered bald, some doctors charge up to $15 per graft
-theres a few good cases such as jotronic but they are not common, theya re rather exceptions, guys who had great donor, favourable characteristics, color, calibre etc
-on the other hand I have seen many mediocre results with super high hairlines that look bizarre, body hair which looks odd, see through coverage, etc
lets face it, numbers just don't add up and if it doesn't work on paper it cant work in practice
opinions?
here are some facts, so lets look at some raw numbers
-NW6s lost half of their hair and that's about 80-100 000 hairs(35-40 000 FUs),
-most of these guys have weak donor hair, sometimes it even thinning, but lets say they are able to extract 6000 grafts
-they say you need 50% of your original density to have illusion of hair, 6 000 grafts is not even 20% of original density
-even if you add body hair its still impossible to reach 50% density(17-20 000 grafts), besides we all know how bad BHT can turn out, poor growth, aesthetics, high prices
-nw6 can easily spend $100 000+ and still be considered bald, some doctors charge up to $15 per graft
-theres a few good cases such as jotronic but they are not common, theya re rather exceptions, guys who had great donor, favourable characteristics, color, calibre etc
-on the other hand I have seen many mediocre results with super high hairlines that look bizarre, body hair which looks odd, see through coverage, etc
lets face it, numbers just don't add up and if it doesn't work on paper it cant work in practice
opinions?
Comment