Histogen's FINAL Phase I/IIa Results (2013)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Scientalk56
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 282

    #76
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Look at the hair count. Only about 2% increase in temples after 24 weeks.
    where is that written? :O ?

    Comment

    • Arashi
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2012
      • 3888

      #77
      Originally posted by Scientalk56
      where is that written? :O ?
      Just look at the chart under 'temporal recession region' in the PDF Desmond posted. You're talking baout 'terminal density'. It seems to me that this means the terminal hairs just got 25% thicker. Which might give a somewhat noticable effect. But only if you have hair on your temples to begin with, since temple hair count only increased with 2% after 24 months, in that same chart.

      Comment

      • Thinning87
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2012
        • 847

        #78
        Originally posted by Arashi
        Hehe, that's just terminology. They need someone to bring them money to carry on with their research, I don't care how you call it.
        No this is not like debating if the glass is half full or half empty.

        If they were looking for an investor they'd be in trouble, and that's how you want to make it look. But guess what: "Investor" Not Equal "Partner".

        So they are not in trouble and everything is proceeding according to plan. This is the point here, so stop spreading unfunded negative rumors because you are sad for your own reasons.

        Comment

        • Arashi
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2012
          • 3888

          #79
          Originally posted by Thinning87
          No this is not like debating if the glass is half full or half empty.

          If they were looking for an investor they'd be in trouble, and that's how you want to make it look. But guess what: "Investor" Not Equal "Partner".

          So they are not in trouble and everything is proceeding according to plan. This is the point here, so stop spreading unfunded negative rumors because you are sad for your own reasons.
          I'm not 'sad', but just tremendously disappointed by these results. And again, I don't really care how you call it, investor, partner or whatever. What I'm saying is that it's going to be very difficult for them to find one and that in MY OPINION chances of this product ever reaching the market greatly dimmed after these results.

          Comment

          • Scientalk56
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2012
            • 282

            #80
            Originally posted by Arashi
            Just look at the chart under 'temporal recession region' in the PDF Desmond posted. You're talking baout 'terminal density'. It seems to me that this means the terminal hairs just got 25% thicker. Which might give a somewhat noticable effect. But only if you have hair on your temples to begin with, since temple hair count only increased with 2% after 24 months, in that same chart.
            Can you print screen that please? i can't see it :S

            Comment

            • Arashi
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2012
              • 3888

              #81
              Originally posted by Scientalk56
              Can you print screen that please? i can't see it :S
              See the big 'RESULTS' heading in green ? Then look below the picture. You'll see a chart there.

              Comment

              • Scientalk56
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2012
                • 282

                #82
                lol cant see it, srsly

                lol,
                i think Freud has to say something about not seeing this...
                Is my mind trying so hard to block that, so i wont get traumatized? lol

                Comment

                • Arashi
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2012
                  • 3888

                  #83
                  Originally posted by Scientalk56
                  lol,
                  i think Freud has to say something about not seeing this...
                  Is my mind trying so hard to block that, so i wont get traumatized? lol
                  Sorry, I was even pointing you to the wrong chart. It's in the colomn to the right of that colum with the 'results' heading. But you can't miss it

                  Comment

                  • Scientalk56
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2012
                    • 282

                    #84
                    ohhh... we're f*c*ed.. :|

                    i mean if Histogen can't regrow my very big temples, my head will still look funny with new thick hair and no temples... :S

                    Comment

                    • garethbale
                      Senior Member
                      • Apr 2012
                      • 605

                      #85
                      Originally posted by Scientalk56
                      ohhh... we're f*c*ed.. :|

                      i mean if Histogen can't regrow my very big temples, my head will still look funny with new thick hair and no temples... :S
                      Transplant for the temples my friend

                      Comment

                      • Vox
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2013
                        • 298

                        #86
                        OK guys, you seem to severely downplay the anaemia part. This is no joke. It is not like the side effects we knew so far. Who can guarantee that you will not develop anaemia after some years of repetitive treatments, even if you don't exceed what it seems to be safe today? I would not be surprised if they go another safety round because of this.

                        Comment

                        • bigentries
                          Senior Member
                          • Dec 2011
                          • 465

                          #87
                          Another intercytex situation, mediocre results (now with safety concerns) and still people try to defend them.
                          Like Intercytex, I bet Histogen will quietly disappear from the scene.

                          This pushes HM at least 20 years

                          The silence from Aderans tells me they have the same troubles. Now let's wait until a new savior arises

                          Comment

                          • Arashi
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2012
                            • 3888

                            #88
                            Originally posted by bigentries
                            Another intercytex situation, mediocre results (now with safety concerns) and still people try to defend them.
                            Like Intercytex, I bet Histogen will quietly disappear from the scene.

                            This pushes HM at least 20 years

                            The silence from Aderans tells me they have the same troubles. Now let's wait until a new savior arises
                            Agreed that silence is a very bad sign in this business. Companies with success usually like to boast them ASAP and publicize any favorable interim result as soon as they can. However I don't agree that this pushes back HM 20 years. Don't forget that Jahoda already succeeded at bio-engineering a human hair follicle and have it grow on human skin !! They just need to optimize it and run trials. But 20 years is way too pessimistic here for something that they've already succeeded doing !

                            Comment

                            • Vox
                              Senior Member
                              • Jan 2013
                              • 298

                              #89
                              Originally posted by Arashi
                              Don't forget that Jahoda already succeeded at bio-engineering a human hair follicle and have it grow on human skin !! They just need to optimize it and run trials. But 20 years is way too pessimistic here for something that they've already succeeded doing !
                              How about 5-10 years for this kind of cure?

                              Comment

                              • Arashi
                                Senior Member
                                • Aug 2012
                                • 3888

                                #90
                                Originally posted by Vox
                                How about 5-10 years for this kind of cure?
                                That's what I'm hoping for and seems realistic. But man, who knows. Always something unexpected arises. But I have faith, great progress IS being made and since they've already done it as a proof of concept, it gives me great hope for this technique.

                                Comment

                                Working...