Replicel

[UK_]

I remember this lol - the gene therapy that would cure baldness in 5 years time... 9 years ago!

As far as I know they tested this on mice but not on humans, I think they concentrated on using the compound to regenerate heart function, which is a tad more important than hair loss lol.

Anyone else have any ideas why this didnt cure us?

[67mph]

When it comes to reading threads and posts in the 'future treaments' section on this (and other hairloss forum) websites, i start to suffer from a very serious case of déjà vu.

I wouldn't even consider myself as a hairloss forum veteran, or even well educated in hairloss in the slightest, or even a daily user of hairloss sites, but cripes it can get ridiculous, with the sheer volume of 'new' and 'old' and 'advanced' treatments flooding the market in the cure for baldness ...i feel dizzy!

Hairloss cure? 10 years to go from today, or 10 years to go in 10 years from today??

[67mph]

...we're all seeing and saying the same things over and over and over again.

Don't knock me for saying what i'm saying (before you do) as that's overly predictable aswell!!

[UK_]

Originally Posted by 67mph

...we're all seeing and saying the same things over and over and over again.

Don't knock me for saying what i'm saying (before you do) as that's overly predictable aswell!!

There hasnt been a time in history where so many regenerative approaches to treating hair loss have been in actual human clinical trials, they are making progress.

[UK_]

The fact remains that people call Replicel a failure but it was only ONE treatment and a single 6 month follow-up, if the treatment was applied 3 - 4 times over the period of a year you'd probably get much better results, which is why Replicel are taking phase 1 results as a positive, they KNOW they can improve the results.

[Horseshoe]

Originally Posted by UK_

The fact remains that people call Replicel a failure but it was only ONE treatment and a single 6 month follow-up, if the treatment was applied 3 - 4 times over the period of a year you'd probably get much better results, which is why Replicel are taking phase 1 results as a positive, they KNOW they can improve the results.

I hope your right. The stock has been down about 66% since the six month results. So if anyone really believes they are the real deal then they should buy it at the current discount. As for me, I already bought it at the over inflated price of $2.60 and sitting on a big loss. I have not sold or bought anymore, just waiting with my fingers crossed and hoping for a cure.

[hellouser]

Originally Posted by UK_

The fact remains that people call Replicel a failure but it was only ONE treatment and a single 6 month follow-up, if the treatment was applied 3 - 4 times over the period of a year you'd probably get much better results, which is why Replicel are taking phase 1 results as a positive, they KNOW they can improve the results.

I really wonder what results would look like from a combination of replicel and aderans or histogen..... hmmm.

[kaandereli]

i wonder when will replicel publish 12 months results.they should have already collected the data in july

[The Alchemist]

Originally Posted by UK_

The fact remains that people call Replicel a failure but it was only ONE treatment and a single 6 month follow-up, if the treatment was applied 3 - 4 times over the period of a year you'd probably get much better results, which is why Replicel are taking phase 1 results as a positive, they KNOW they can improve the results.

They should be coming up on their 12 month time point, pretty soon. I thought it would be around October. Hopefully they'll update ....be curious to see if they achieved more terminal hair growth.

[UK_]

Originally Posted by The Alchemist

They should be coming up on their 12 month time point, pretty soon. I thought it would be around October. Hopefully they'll update ....be curious to see if they achieved more terminal hair growth.

I believe you're correct, I just want to hear when they plan to start their Phase 2 trial.