My MPB hypothesis. - Page 6 - BaldTruthTalk.com
+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 61
  1. #51
    Senior Member 2020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by youngin View Post
    UV rays cause larger sebaceous glands. Proven. Larger sebaceous glands draw more DHT. Proven. And then?
    most likely it's not even close to being significant otherwise everyone would go bald. Why would nature make your scalp so fking sensitive to UV rays? It's not.

    explain excess body hair, prostate cancer and other health problems associated with balding... obviously the problem is "on the inside" and is not concentrated within your scalp

  2. #52
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    338

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    explain excess body hair, prostate cancer and other health problems associated with balding... obviously the problem is "on the inside" and is not concentrated within your scalp
    Excess body hair = testosterone
    And like all cancer, prostate cancer = immune system, environment, diet + testosterone.

    Balding and prostate cancer are not synonomous. It may be present in more balding men because of the higher tesosterone levels.

    No one said they weren't higher. You disprove yourself. If the problem was on the inside then all hair would be effected.

  3. #53
    Senior Member 2020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by youngin View Post
    Excess body hair = testosterone
    so we all have too much testosterone?


    Quote Originally Posted by youngin View Post
    And like all cancer, prostate cancer = immune system, environment, diet + testosterone.
    why do balding people have a higher chance of getting prostate cancer? obviously something is off in them internally otherwise the risks would be exactly the same...

    Quote Originally Posted by youngin View Post
    Balding and prostate cancer are not synonomous. It may be present in more balding men because of the higher tesosterone levels.
    yes of course... that's why middle aged men go bald -- too much testosterone

    Quote Originally Posted by youngin View Post
    No one said they weren't higher. You disprove yourself. If the problem was on the inside then all hair would be effected.
    what do you mean by all hair? all SCALP hair? You still don't get it why baldness has a pattern?

  4. #54
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    338

    Default

    Your mind is not right. You are misunderstanding and repeating everything. Or maybe you are just stupid. Do some reading of studies.

  5. #55
    Senior Member 2020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by youngin View Post
    Your mind is not right. You are misunderstanding and repeating everything. Or maybe you are just stupid. Do some reading of studies.
    I just proved that MPB is an internal problem and not just a problem with your follicles/scalp...

  6. #56
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    165

    Default

    nice to know, from now on I'll go out with an umbrella on sunny days, just like a delicate lady from the 1800's and I can't wait to find a pair of silk gloves to match that outfit, yummy

  7. #57
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,398

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by konfusion View Post
    nice to know, from now on I'll go out with an umbrella on sunny days, just like a delicate lady from the 1800's and I can't wait to find a pair of silk gloves to match that outfit, yummy
    looool

    10char

  8. #58
    Senior Member 2020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gutted View Post
    looool

    10char
    is that you on hairsite arguing about cox-2 and reflex hypo?

  9. #59
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,398

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    is that you on hairsite arguing about cox-2 and reflex hypo?
    its not an argument.

    im only giving them a heads up now, rather than them having to wait for science to prove it in the future, if they ever will.

  10. #60
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    338

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    I just proved that MPB is an internal problem and not just a problem with your follicles/scalp...
    lmao. What a small minded dumbass. You haven't proved a damn thing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

7 year fine hairline results by Dr Lindsey
Today 07:15 AM
Last Post By Dr. Lindsey
Today 07:15 AM
No Shave Fue
07-03-2022 08:11 PM
by TexEx89
Last Post By TexEx89
07-03-2022 08:11 PM
Two consultations, two opposing opinions?
07-03-2022 10:55 AM
by JFR
Last Post By JFR
07-03-2022 10:55 AM
Gene Therapy for hairloss (45 day update)
07-03-2022 01:32 AM
Last Post By Dr A's Clinic
07-03-2022 01:32 AM