Dr. Woods: Food for Thought Here

[Follicle Death Row]

I'm still on the fence but beginning to think perhaps HST is legit. However here's some food for thought.

Criticism of HST's purported method
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntMr...8&feature=plcp

Death of a Follicle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ebF...k&feature=plcp

Let's discuss.

[NeedHairASAP]

I'm still on the fence but beginning to think perhaps HST is legit. However here's some food for thought.

Criticism of HST's purported method
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntMr...8&feature=plcp

Death of a Follicle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ebF...k&feature=plcp

Let's discuss.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9655431

the above is one of many papers that have found a follicle can be transected, or bisected.

So Dr. Ray Woods is basically a desperate liar...sorry to say.

not only that, but the above paper suggests that there may be some merit in transection-- low and behold there was!

[Follicle Death Row]

I know they can be transected but I kind of worry about consistency. I think HST may well work. I'm going to put together some Wesley Sneijder stuff tomorrow.

[NeedHairASAP]

I'm still on the fence but beginning to think perhaps HST is legit. However here's some food for thought.

Criticism of HST's purported method
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntMr...8&feature=plcp

Death of a Follicle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ebF...k&feature=plcp

Let's discuss.

he most efficient follicular regenerating unit and the smallest follicular regenerating unit: Potential treatments for hair loss
Sen Wanga, Yu Lia, Ying-Chang Jia, Chang-Min Lina, Cheng Manb, Xiao-Xuan Zhengc
Received 14 May 2009; accepted 17 May 2009. published online 22 June 2009.

Summary
Hair loss affects many people, especially adult males. An effective treatment is hair transplantation which involves harvesting hair grafts from a donor site and relocating them to a bald site. However, this traditional method, equivalent to one-to-one transplantation, simply redistributes hair rather than increases the number of existing hairs. Although hair transplantation is actually the transplantation of hair follicle (HF), it has been confirmed that whole HFs could be reformed from parts of HFs containing different constituents, implying the existence of more efficient and smaller HF regenerating units in a whole HF. Thus we hypothesize that the most efficient follicular regenerating unit (EFRU) and the smallest follicular regenerating unit (SFRU) could be found in whole HFs. As a result, the one-to-many hair transplantation would be achieved in clinic. One-to-many means to double or triple the number of hairs. In order to test and verify the hypothesis, we design a method called hair follicle micro-dissection (HFM) which aims to help find the regenerating units and increase the number of hair for transplantation. The postulation may provide a more mature and realistic treatment for hair loss if it proved to be practical.

Source: http://www.medical-hypotheses.com/ar...360-0/abstract
-----------------------------



OKAY? can we all please agree that Dr. Ray Woods and his "follicle is like a soft plant" analogies are BS

[Follicle Death Row]

Thanks for the paper. At a quick glance it looks reassuring. I will read it tomorrow. Good stuff.

[NeedHairASAP]

I'm still on the fence but beginning to think perhaps HST is legit. However here's some food for thought.

Criticism of HST's purported method
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntMr...8&feature=plcp

Death of a Follicle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ebF...k&feature=plcp

Let's discuss.

If woods had taken FUE the route gho has taken HST, with his patent etc., then he would be the richest man alive...instead he is the most bitter.

[Maradona]

If woods had taken FUE the route gho has taken HST, with his patent etc., then he would be the richest man alive...instead he is the most bitter.

It is pure horse diarrhea . I think this should've been even posted here.

It's an embarrassing attempt by Dr. Woods unfortunately.

Follicle death row, you will find thousands of things online to criticize Gho. Just make sure you don't post the ridiculous stuff here. It always helps if the claims are backed up by scientific journals and data.

Consistency? If there's even a 1 out of 3000 follicles that are effectively multiplied then there's place for improvement and what the hell do you think Gho's been doing since the 90s? lololol.

Food for thought?

Food for dumbasses, bro.

[Follicle Death Row]

I'm glad you guys are so confident. If it really works then it is a game changer. If you have the money then there's no need to worry about future treatments.

[Maradona]

I dont think it works on me. My baldness is too aggressive. I would have to use other treatments besides HST because my donor and sides of the head will thin out eventually.

I am sure this is not for everyone either but for many is a cure. It broadens the cure for those who are HT candidates.

Some people only stop at nw3-4 . Those can be cured with normal HTs.

Now with Gho I think it extends to nw5 and nw6.

Not future nw7s who thin out bad even in their donor and sides.

Also not guys with DUPA or FPB with no stable zone.

The arrangement of your follicles seems to play role too if you see Gho's videos and how he uses his technique. The follicles must be very close to each other. The psychos at hairsite analyzed this stuff. I am not a 100% sure on this but it does make sense.

I never saw Gho as a cure. That's why I never payed much interest in it.

I just see it as the perfect HT.

[Follicle Death Row]

Well one way or another hopefully we all get the Diego mop back one day.