+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38
  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,816

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    10^99 % sure

    As I explained: this is just another human flaw that should be fixed at an early age like tonsils and circumcision.... why can't they do the same with AGA?



    yeah but so what, I'm sure they could find a way to disable them permanently... probably much less complicated than what they're doing now.

    No need to research through the whole ****ing gene tree to find "MPB gene"... the problem is right here - ANDROGEN RECEPTORS!
    How would you know - are you a scientist?

  2. #22
    Senior Member 2020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yeahyeahyeah View Post
    How would you know - are you a scientist?
    how would I know what? that AR are responsible for hair loss?

  3. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    59

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    how would I know what? that AR are responsible for hair loss?
    Yes, that's what yeahyeahyeah was asking. And I'll second that. What makes you so sure it is this simple and do you have any method in mind of how to get rid of AR's on the scalp permanently?

  4. #24
    Senior Member 2020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WillhasWill View Post
    Yes, that's what yeahyeahyeah was asking. And I'll second that. What makes you so sure it is this simple and do you have any method in mind of how to get rid of AR's on the scalp permanently?
    probably not that complicated... either way, with decades and decades spent on hair cloning trying to find the "right cells", they should just focus on solving the main problem(something medicine NEVER does) -> disabling androgen interactions with hair follicles

  5. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    77

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2020 View Post
    10^99 % sure

    As I explained: this is just another human flaw that should be fixed at an early age like tonsils and circumcision.... why can't they do the same with AGA?



    yeah but so what, I'm sure they could find a way to disable them permanently... probably much less complicated than what they're doing now.

    No need to research through the whole ****ing gene tree to find "MPB gene"... the problem is right here - ANDROGEN RECEPTORS!
    And do you think that S-Equol can kill the Androgen receptors??

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,744

    Default

    Im especially impressed at the fact that Anthony Atala believes this can lead to a better form of cell therapy for hair loss, which nobody has mentioned yet.

    Any more info on why Atala made that comment other than him working in the same field? Is he also working with the Tokyo researchers to develop a cell based therapy because that would be beyond incredible if it were true!... but I doubt it..

  7. #27
    Senior Member 2020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by damielmillo View Post
    And do you think that S-Equol can kill the Androgen receptors??
    no... nothing at the moment can't and probably nothing will ever will because medicine always picks the most complicated and indirect way of solving any problem - case in point: Tokyo Guys, Gho...

  8. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    77

    Default

    So, S Equol only will work like Finasteride?
    I think at least S Equol may mantain the existing hair !!

  9. #29
    Senior Member 2020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by damielmillo View Post
    So, S Equol only will work like Finasteride?
    I think at least S Equol may mantain the existing hair !!
    finasteride binds to 5AR
    equol binds directly to DHT

    they're very different

  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,744

    Default

    @2020 Yes but we would rather have something that blocks the GPR44 receptor - DHT is old news.

Similar Threads

  1. Stem Cells
    By DepressedByHairLoss in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-31-2012, 07:52 AM
  2. First use of stem cells in humans show no adverse effects
    By clandestine in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 01-25-2012, 01:09 PM
  3. Curing baldness - Where do I start?
    By Smega in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-06-2011, 05:40 PM
  4. stem cells
    By FML1990 in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-05-2011, 10:31 AM
  5. European scientists have reprogrammed stem cells to grow skin and hair cells
    By clee984 in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-25-2010, 11:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

1800 graft repair case results by Dr. Lindsey
Yesterday 08:38 AM
Last Post By Dr. Lindsey
Yesterday 08:38 AM
Navigating the German Job Market as a Kenyan Citizen
11-04-2023 06:31 AM
Last Post By Keegan212
Yesterday 03:51 AM
DR HAKAN DOGANAY/ 4500 GRAFTS / Implanter Pen+FUE
03-26-2024 04:15 PM
Last Post By Hakan Doganay, MD
03-26-2024 04:15 PM
The Mane Event for Thursday, June 15th, 2023
06-15-2023 02:59 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
03-26-2024 08:05 AM
Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
03-25-2024 08:24 PM