-
Originally Posted by 2020
10^99 % sure
As I explained: this is just another human flaw that should be fixed at an early age like tonsils and circumcision.... why can't they do the same with AGA?
yeah but so what, I'm sure they could find a way to disable them permanently... probably much less complicated than what they're doing now.
No need to research through the whole ****ing gene tree to find "MPB gene"... the problem is right here - ANDROGEN RECEPTORS!
How would you know - are you a scientist?
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by yeahyeahyeah
How would you know - are you a scientist?
how would I know what? that AR are responsible for hair loss?
-
Originally Posted by 2020
how would I know what? that AR are responsible for hair loss?
Yes, that's what yeahyeahyeah was asking. And I'll second that. What makes you so sure it is this simple and do you have any method in mind of how to get rid of AR's on the scalp permanently?
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by WillhasWill
Yes, that's what yeahyeahyeah was asking. And I'll second that. What makes you so sure it is this simple and do you have any method in mind of how to get rid of AR's on the scalp permanently?
probably not that complicated... either way, with decades and decades spent on hair cloning trying to find the "right cells", they should just focus on solving the main problem(something medicine NEVER does) -> disabling androgen interactions with hair follicles
-
Originally Posted by 2020
10^99 % sure
As I explained: this is just another human flaw that should be fixed at an early age like tonsils and circumcision.... why can't they do the same with AGA?
yeah but so what, I'm sure they could find a way to disable them permanently... probably much less complicated than what they're doing now.
No need to research through the whole ****ing gene tree to find "MPB gene"... the problem is right here - ANDROGEN RECEPTORS!
And do you think that S-Equol can kill the Androgen receptors??
-
Im especially impressed at the fact that Anthony Atala believes this can lead to a better form of cell therapy for hair loss, which nobody has mentioned yet.
Any more info on why Atala made that comment other than him working in the same field? Is he also working with the Tokyo researchers to develop a cell based therapy because that would be beyond incredible if it were true!... but I doubt it..
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by damielmillo
And do you think that S-Equol can kill the Androgen receptors??
no... nothing at the moment can't and probably nothing will ever will because medicine always picks the most complicated and indirect way of solving any problem - case in point: Tokyo Guys, Gho...
-
So, S Equol only will work like Finasteride?
I think at least S Equol may mantain the existing hair !!
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by damielmillo
So, S Equol only will work like Finasteride?
I think at least S Equol may mantain the existing hair !!
finasteride binds to 5AR
equol binds directly to DHT
they're very different
-
@2020 Yes but we would rather have something that blocks the GPR44 receptor - DHT is old news.
Similar Threads
-
By DepressedByHairLoss in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 15
Last Post: 03-31-2012, 07:52 AM
-
By clandestine in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 16
Last Post: 01-25-2012, 01:09 PM
-
By Smega in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 2
Last Post: 11-06-2011, 05:40 PM
-
By FML1990 in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 8
Last Post: 10-05-2011, 10:31 AM
-
By clee984 in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 4
Last Post: 08-25-2010, 11:31 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks