Tweet
I agree people are not reading your posts carefully and only because propecia blocks DHT = more hair.
In my opinion it goes like this:
Our case, the people in their 20s and early 30s losing their hair. Our hair wasn't just programmed to fall out at this age, there was a trigger. My family history all of them lost their or at least seem noticeable in their late 40s and there are NONE absolutely nobody who looked like me in his 20s.
We get it, the way it works is something like this:
DHT--->binds to AR in progenitor cells---> follicular stem cells stop signaling derma papilla cells to replicate and produce more hair ----> hair is proportional to the number of these cells = miniaturized hair.
Derma papilla hairs die altogether = no hair.
We get it we are genetically susceptible to this process, we get that it is a gene trait.
But why the **** should we express this gene so young? especially in some of our cases.
Answer is simple excess in "something" reached or went over a certain threshold in our body making our follicles start the degenerative process.
Now, if you reduce the DHT, it's too late, the follicles have already started the degenerative process but you will make the progress much slower if you reduce DHT. You need to go back in time, the way it was BEFORE MPB was triggered, get your hormones and chemical substances in your body reach the same balance you had before MPB kicked in and that's how you will "prolong" your gene from expressing itself altogether.
You will always have DHT we get that, we had DHT before in our teens RAGING through the rooftop and most of us didn't start balding back then...
So. Listen to this guy, think outside the box for once because if you keep sticking to what is known NOW there will never be progress.
Plus nobody gives a RAT ASS about MPB so progress will be much slower than ZERO, it WILL BE NEGATIVE.
In my opinion it goes like this:
Our case, the people in their 20s and early 30s losing their hair. Our hair wasn't just programmed to fall out at this age, there was a trigger. My family history all of them lost their or at least seem noticeable in their late 40s and there are NONE absolutely nobody who looked like me in his 20s.
We get it, the way it works is something like this:
DHT--->binds to AR in progenitor cells---> follicular stem cells stop signaling derma papilla cells to replicate and produce more hair ----> hair is proportional to the number of these cells = miniaturized hair.
Derma papilla hairs die altogether = no hair.
We get it we are genetically susceptible to this process, we get that it is a gene trait.
But why the **** should we express this gene so young? especially in some of our cases.
Answer is simple excess in "something" reached or went over a certain threshold in our body making our follicles start the degenerative process.
Now, if you reduce the DHT, it's too late, the follicles have already started the degenerative process but you will make the progress much slower if you reduce DHT. You need to go back in time, the way it was BEFORE MPB was triggered, get your hormones and chemical substances in your body reach the same balance you had before MPB kicked in and that's how you will "prolong" your gene from expressing itself altogether.
You will always have DHT we get that, we had DHT before in our teens RAGING through the rooftop and most of us didn't start balding back then...
So. Listen to this guy, think outside the box for once because if you keep sticking to what is known NOW there will never be progress.
Plus nobody gives a RAT ASS about MPB so progress will be much slower than ZERO, it WILL BE NEGATIVE.
Comment