-
Originally Posted by allTheGoodNamesAreTaken
There are encouraging differences though... one being that both Histogen and Replicel (or rather, Replicel's method, recently purchased by a big company) are both making bold statements, and actions, regarding 2018 release dates in specific countries, as well as commencing further trials soon if not already. Histogen has recently managed to raise millions of dollars too, so that's encouraging. Plus Histogen definitely can regrow noticeable amounts of hair if they have not added fake hair to the scalps in their photographs (ie. if they've faked them, the typical 'different lighting/combing/camera angle' tricks that scams use cannot explain the amount of regrowth their photos appear to show). And those purported results are from a single treatment when multiple ones should presumably do better. And they need to see what happens if they vary the doses. Things are still uncertain and too much hope is dangerous but I don't see any reason to write them off at this moment, just the opposite if anything.
Could be. But what it seems strange to me is that they show their results with only one picture. If the trials the did really works, why don`t the show more pictures. Because the regrowth of hair in a single subject could be by chance and don't necessary means that works in other people.
Similar Threads
-
By Davey Jones in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 15
Last Post: 05-14-2012, 08:57 PM
-
By Artista in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 0
Last Post: 03-09-2012, 04:32 AM
-
By Dutch_Dude in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 3
Last Post: 02-07-2011, 08:06 AM
-
By Weedwacker in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 1
Last Post: 01-22-2011, 11:32 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks