what do people on this site need for a cure?

[Tracy C]

I can accept that you do not agree with what a true cure means to me. You are not looking at all the pieces of the puzzle and I can accept that - but you are trashing me just for the sake of trashing me. Is there even a slight chance that you could even try to be a decent human being?

[UK_]

I can accept that you do not agree with what a true cure means to me. You are not looking at all the pieces of the puzzle and I can accept that - but you are trashing me just for the sake of trashing me. Is there even a slight chance that you could even try to be a decent human being?

Your original quote was that immunization would be "the cure" and once a patient is immune to DHT it will be "easier to re-grow lost hair"....<<< what the **** does that even mean? Please explain how it would be easier to re-grow hair if the patient was PHYSICALLY immune to the effects of DHT.... YOU CANT!!! YOU'D STILL HAVE THE SAME ****ING PHYSIOLOGICAL PROBLEMS!!!

Not only will it still be impossible, but YOU BELIEVE this would be "THE HOLY ****ING GRAIL" LMFAO!!!!

What you're saying in essence is that it would be easier to re-grow a patients hand if he took it out of the blender, that by doing so, it becomes a physiologically feasible endeavour in which the scientific/physical barriers to re-growing a completely new hand are suddenly mitigated BECAUSE the cause of his injury is suddenly removed.

[WillhasWill]

Your original quote was that immunization would be "the cure" and once a patient is immune to DHT it will be "easier to re-grow lost hair"....<<< what the **** does that even mean? Please explain how it would be easier to re-grow hair if the patient was PHYSICALLY immune to the effects of DHT.... YOU CANT!!! YOU'D STILL HAVE THE SAME ****ING PHYSIOLOGICAL PROBLEMS!!!

Not only will it still be impossible, but YOU BELIEVE this would be "THE HOLY ****ING GRAIL" LMFAO!!!!

What you're saying in essence is that it would be easier to re-grow a patients hand if he took it out of the blender, that by doing so, it becomes a physiologically feasible endeavour in which the scientific/physical barriers to re-growing a completely new hand are suddenly mitigated BECAUSE the cause of his injury is suddenly removed.

I don't think you deserve a response with the way you post here but I disagree with you and agree with Tracy so I will.

The immunization of hair follicles to baldness. Note I say baldness and not DHT. Whatever it takes so hair follicles are immune to baldness is the cure to baldness. This is simple. Growing hair that has already been lost is a secondary and separate problem in reality. Once baldness is essentially cured, then stimulating and regrowing the follicles that have been destroyed is a separate issue. But baldness would be cured.

Also, your last statement about the fact that it would be easier to regrow a patients hand if he took it out of the blender is very true. The most advanced science in the world that would regrow any limb, would be worthless is that limb was constantly in a blender!

Hence hair loss, we need to focus on curing the cause of hair loss before we focus on regrowing the hair.