It is well past time to stop this negative BS concerning Replicel.

[The Alchemist]

Study that sentence very carefully.

Study my post very carefully.


"Anyone who can read that news release and come away thinking that efficacy was a minor issue in this trial, either needs glasses or some reading comprehension courses. "

[NeedHairASAP]

Study my post very carefully.


"Anyone who can read that news release and come away thinking that efficacy was a minor issue in this trial, either needs glasses or some reading comprehension courses. "

my guess is reading comprehension courses


subject.... predicate......





nobody is saying there isn't room for improvement... were just saying currently you're better off on rogaine... and probably will be for some time..... long enough a time that you probably shouldn't hope for much from replicel unless there is some DRASTIC, and i mean DRASTIC, changes over the next months/trial








and lastly, I'd like to pose what is probably the most important question for Replicel:



WHAT WENT WRONG? or, DO YOU HAVE A STRATEGY (and the data) TO DETERMINE WHAT WENT WRONG?






I mean to me, it sounds like they're just rolling dice. 1000x typical dosage? now they're going to do less? I mean what is going on? also, people keep saying maybe these hairs will eventually grow.... has replicel stated anywhere that they think this is a possibility? or is that forum speculation?-- it's bad news if the PR or the interview didn't mention this




also, has tracy answered any question yet posed? All i see is her replying with more questions-- all revolving around being "so dumb" "that dumb" "real dumb" etc.... at least follow it up with an explanation.