+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5
Results 41 to 50 of 193

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    293

    Default

    That can’t be correct. These doctors could not sue Dr. Gho for false advertising or for driving patients away because of that false advertising. It is more likely that they reported Gho to a state or country agency for false advertising and the agency might have found no cause for the action. Then Gho went after them for hurting his reputation and they settled with a full retraction and apology. Since the doctors could not prove that Gho was not doing what he claimed to be able to do, the agency had to say there was no just cause for the action.


    Quote Originally Posted by Davey Jones View Post
    My understanding of the situation is that Gho was sued by other hair transplant surgeons because he was claiming to do things that they thought were impossible, and they thought they were losing clients who were woo'ed away by his false promises. As the trial went on, the court decided the evidence was consistent with his advertisements, i.e. that they couldn't successfully sue him, because he wasn't lying, and he could do what he was saying.

    I have no doubt that the letter was written by a lawyer as part of a settlement, but it stands that the proceedings found Gho to be truthful in his assertions. How accurate those trials were, we can't say for sure. I am fairly ignorant to most things Gho related, actually. Hopefully we get some more pics up in this b*tch.

    damielmillo already mentioned that he will be taking pics to try to see evidence of Gho's claims. What about you, NeedHairASAP?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    agaexperts.meteor.com
    Posts
    1,405

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amadeus View Post
    That can’t be correct. These doctors could not sue Dr. Gho for false advertising or for driving patients away because of that false advertising. It is more likely that they reported Gho to a state or country agency for false advertising and the agency might have found no cause for the action. Then Gho went after them for hurting his reputation and they settled with a full retraction and apology. Since the doctors could not prove that Gho was not doing what he claimed to be able to do, the agency had to say there was no just cause for the action.
    Gho sued other doctors for a defamation type deal

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-29-2013, 04:54 PM
  2. Surgeons responses to gho's procedure
    By splitting hairs in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 10-20-2011, 08:31 AM
  3. Gho's 'franchise' model - up and running?
    By Ronin in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 09-24-2011, 10:53 AM
  4. Breaking: Cooley OWNS Cole in autocloning debate
    By wolvie1985 in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-19-2011, 12:09 AM
  5. Is Dr. Gho's HST the real deal?
    By Flowers in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 06-03-2011, 01:36 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
Today 03:16 AM
How do project management consulting firms manage?
10-12-2023 06:15 AM
Last Post By annastark
05-09-2024 09:19 PM
How we do hairline femininization with interview Dr. Lindsey
05-09-2024 07:33 AM
Last Post By Dr. Lindsey
05-09-2024 07:33 AM