-
Originally Posted by Kiwi
Thanks mate. I love your work!
Its no big deal man. I just try to post the news sooner for those who can't listen to the show, live. All the credit goes to Spencer and his camp for making all this possible. Thanks anyways.
-
Originally Posted by CVAZBAR
Its no big deal man. I just try to post the news sooner for those who can't listen to the show, live. All the credit goes to Spencer and his camp for making all this possible. Thanks anyways.
One day we should interview spencer - he must have a pretty awesome story :P
-
Originally Posted by Kiwi
That said. This time I really hope Spencer up his game and asks some hard questions. Such as....
HAVE YOU SEEN / WITNESSED HAIR GROWTH WITH YOUR EYES. IF SO BETTER, THE SAME, OR WORSE THEN PROPECIA
as opposed to
AWWW SO DO YOU STILL FEEL LIKE YOU'VE GOT AN OKAY PRODUCT AND THAT YOU MIGHT LAUNCH IN 5 - 10 YEARS.
I'm so sick of the same BS questions in each interview.
You do know that he likely signed an NDA of some sort. The question you want asked he could not likely answer legally. When you're a publically traded company something like that cannot be answered, so asking the question is pointless as a run-around answer would be given.
-
Originally Posted by NotBelievingIt
You do know that he likely signed an NDA of some sort. The question you want asked he could not likely answer legally. When you're a publically traded company something like that cannot be answered, so asking the question is pointless as a run-around answer would be given.
Exactly.
But if that is the case then why bother!
-
Originally Posted by NotBelievingIt
You do know that he likely signed an NDA of some sort. The question you want asked he could not likely answer legally. When you're a publically traded company something like that cannot be answered, so asking the question is pointless as a run-around answer would be given.
What then is the point of conducting an interview to catch up on the efficacy of a treatment if questions regarding the efficacy are protected by non disclosure agreements? Also, Spencer wouldn't be answering anything; rather he'd be asking the question. There is no legal cause of action against a questioner. If the representative ducks the question that's his doing. But legally Spencer has every right to ask it.
-
Originally Posted by Kampung101
There have a lot of really good clinical discoveries that have come about that had little media hype.
As for Acell (something that had lots of hype surrounding it), that should probably serve as evidence against the notion that "this doesn't have a lot of hype surrounding it, therefore, I shouldn't take it that seriously".
Yes but the thing is, Ken Washenik stated in early 2011 that Phase 2 would be complete by mid-2012, they've now pushed this date back to 2013 - infact regarding Aderans, clinical trial dates have been pushed back since 2007 - its never ending with them... Washenik even said they'd have "much more data to show next year"... that was also stated in early 2011... where is the data? You'd think to attract investors in a recession they'd release SOMETHING by now.
I also dont see the point in an interview unless there is actually data to be discussed - ive a feeling the only new information we'd gain in a current interview with Washenik is to be told we'll just have to wait longer.
-
Originally Posted by UK_
Yes but the thing is, Ken Washenik stated in early 2011 that Phase 2 would be complete by mid-2012, they've now pushed this date back to 2013 - infact regarding Aderans, clinical trial dates have been pushed back since 2007 - its never ending with them... Washenik even said they'd have "much more data to show next year"... that was also stated in early 2011... where is the data? You'd think to attract investors in a recession they'd release SOMETHING by now.
I also dont see the point in an interview unless there is actually data to be discussed - ive a feeling the only new information we'd gain in a current interview with Washenik is to be told we'll just have to wait longer.
True but histogen did get ****ed on (delayed) by a court case.
Either way you're right about the interview. I pray its not just more delays and empty promises :P
-
Originally Posted by Kiwi
True but histogen did get ****ed on (delayed) by a court case.
Either way you're right about the interview. I pray its not just more delays and empty promises :P
I was referring to Aderans - but yeah Histogen have been battling a court case - they've good reason to be running late.
-
The thought of patent trolls slowing down the progress of new treatments makes me very annoyed. You can bet the bastards behind that decision are all NW1's and 2's.
Similar Threads
-
By gmonasco in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 4
Last Post: 05-17-2015, 06:13 AM
-
By Kiwi in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 11
Last Post: 02-17-2012, 04:35 PM
-
By gmonasco in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 2
Last Post: 06-17-2010, 01:56 PM
-
By blowmeup in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 4
Last Post: 03-02-2010, 04:10 PM
-
By tbtadmin in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 0
Last Post: 04-28-2009, 12:06 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks