+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 33
  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 25 going on 65 View Post
    The examiner story is nothing to worry about. Dr. Irwig conducted his "study" by ranking 71 members of propeciahelp.com on the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale. In fact Spencer Kobren covered that story a year ago.
    There isn't currently scientific evidence that finasteride causes permanent impotence or anything of the sort. I generally would advise against reading pop media articles about hair loss treatments.
    Also, there are lawsuits against all kinds of drugs on a regular basis. They mean nothing in themselves. You often see lawyers advertising on television about a particular kind of medicine; it's how some of them make a living.

    The rate of side effects for finasteride is quite low (though I agree it may be higher than 2-3%), and those that come up often resolve on their own while continuing the medication. I have been on 1.25 mg for over a year and I'm fine.
    If you experience side effects on this drug, you can try a lower dose (.5 mg is a fine place to start).
    Finally, don't take StressedToTheBald seriously. He's the resident troll on The Bald Truth at the moment, and probably won't have his account for long.

    Good luck.
    Thanks. I appreciate the feed back

  2. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    43

    Default

    Thank you. I appreciate the feed back. How your results?

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,476

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glawre View Post
    Thank you. I appreciate the feed back. How your results?
    You're welcome.
    My results have been good. I was about a NW2 with quite a bit of diffuse thinning; I have maintained and improved my hair all over my head, and in the crown. My hairline and temples are holding but I have not seen any regrowth in those areas. (To my knowledge, it's near impossible to regrow temple hairs once they fall out, unfortunately.)
    There are 2 or 3 spots that are still a bit thinner than I would like. We'll see if they improve in the next 6-8 months, but I get the feeling I'm near the peak of this drug's results.
    I also use 2% ketoconazole shampoo, but not minoxidil.

  4. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 25 going on 65 View Post
    You're welcome.
    My results have been good. I was about a NW2 with quite a bit of diffuse thinning; I have maintained and improved my hair all over my head, and in the crown. My hairline and temples are holding but I have not seen any regrowth in those areas. (To my knowledge, it's near impossible to regrow temple hairs once they fall out, unfortunately.)
    There are 2 or 3 spots that are still a bit thinner than I would like. We'll see if they improve in the next 6-8 months, but I get the feeling I'm near the peak of this drug's results.
    I also use 2% ketoconazole shampoo, but not minoxidil.
    Thanks again. I hate to be personal but what about side effects?

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,476

    Default

    Within the first six months on the drug, I noticed a slight change in the texture of ejaculatory fluid. This has reverted over time, but I don't think it's 100% back to the way it was.
    I'm not positive if it's from finasteride because I have very inconsistent, and often unhealthy, lifestyle choices (plus I am on a couple other medicines). I wouldn't be surprised if it was a mild fin side effect. If that's the case, though, it has been worth it to me.
    It's also possible that I have less frequent morning erections, but I'm not sure about that one. (And the other medications I use can cause this as well.)

    Otherwise, so far so good. I have a normal sex life and haven't seen any other changes.

  6. #26
    Inactive
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Norwood 3-4
    Posts
    452

    Default

    Half dose or not, propecia is hazardous.
    It will very soon get banned officially or the risks and warnings will be upgraded to highest health hazard levels, in order to include all hidden risks - permanent erectile dysfunction, impotence, prostate cancer, depression, etc.

    In the meantime, I see some doctors are becoming aware and say if they knew of these newly discovered hazards, they would never had prescribed it in the first place.

  7. #27
    Senior Member 2020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stressedtothebald View Post
    half dose or not, propecia is hazardous.
    It will very soon get banned officially or the risks and warnings will be upgraded to highest health hazard levels, in order to include all hidden risks - permanent erectile dysfunction, impotence, prostate cancer, depression, etc.

    In the meantime, i see some doctors are becoming aware and say if they knew of these newly discovered hazards, they would never had prescribed it in the first place.
    go away!!!

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,476

    Default

    Glawre,

    Please do not worry about StressedToTheBald's fear mongering. He is way out of line; I have started reporting his spam posts on a regular basis.

    Do feel free to ask any questions you come up with. I don't mind if they are personal.

  9. #29
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    943

    Thumbs down

    Quote Originally Posted by StressedToTheBald View Post
    Half dose or not, propecia is hazardous.
    It will very soon get banned officially or the risks and warnings will be upgraded to highest health hazard levels, in order to include all hidden risks - permanent erectile dysfunction, impotence, prostate cancer, depression, etc.

    In the meantime, I see some doctors are becoming aware and say if they knew of these newly discovered hazards, they would never had prescribed it in the first place.
    This person is single most misguided person on the forum. I’m usually quite tolerant when it comes to people’s opinions, but I am starting to believe that he might be a well disguised spammer associated with one of the anti-Propecia agenda websites. He is not providing good advice to new members of the forum and I’m shocked that he does not understand that both Beta-Sitosterol and Saw Palmetto can cause loss of libido and impotence. Persistent sexual sides effects have been reported by men taking these herbs for Prostate enlargement. To promote these herbs and sterols as a safe alternative to Propecia, is not only irresponsible, but completely wrong. This is not a matter of opinion, it is a fact! Anything that lowers DHT can cause sexual dysfunction in some men and sexual side effects from these natural products have been reported for many years.

  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    595

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 25 going on 65 View Post
    It's also possible that I have less frequent morning erections, but I'm not sure about that one. (And the other medications I use can cause this as well.)
    Everyone (well, obv not females ) has erections at night. Having them when you wake up is the same sleep cycle as remembering dreams. It all depends on when you wake up in the cycle.

    Therefore it is also quite possible you are not sleeping as soundly and/or not waking up during or at the tail end of a REM sleep session.

    Quote Originally Posted by Winston
    ...To promote these herbs and sterols as a safe alternative to Propecia irresponsible, but completely wrong.
    Some people would prefer to put something from nature in their body that messes with hormones, rather then something made in the lab. S.P. is clearly a far less potent 5ar inhibiter then Finasteride - and it is that potentcy that is the cause of the effects and their "longevity", due entirely to each persons own sensitivity to lower 5ar conversions in their endocrine system. Its quite possible someone whose hair is sensitive to DHT, but not overly, is "over-dosing" with Finasteride and causing more problems the necessary by inhibiting that much DHT and 5AR. Is it necessary to decrease it by 70% for all cases? Sure thats the best hair result, but is it the best result for the total well being? *shrug*

    Mercks ultimate failure is not following up on *why* side effects were seen in some men and not others. Of course, doing that with every drug would add millions to the cost of development, so they simply do not do it unless the sides are very serious - I mean life threatening serious.

Similar Threads

  1. Half a pill of propecia?
    By robberob in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-30-2018, 11:43 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-24-2015, 01:03 AM
  3. Increase propecia dose?
    By abb83 in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-14-2010, 02:44 AM
  4. Half Dose Propecia Question
    By Glawre in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-08-2010, 05:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

purchase requisition in business central
12-19-2023 05:38 AM
Last Post By David9232
Today 11:39 AM
Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
Today 10:12 AM
An inconvenient truth about FUE
Today 07:24 AM
Last Post By Dr. Lindsey
Today 07:24 AM
Surgeons in SE Asia (Thailand)
10-20-2018 10:30 AM
by martino
Last Post By EFab
04-17-2024 08:34 AM