Tweet
Hi
I would need some help in chosing between these 2 doctors.
I did research on both of them and Im still not sure which one should I go for.
Im after these 2 docs bc I i will need to use body/beard hair for my procedure as my head donor
wont be enough to gimme coverage and density i desire, so you can see that limits my choices.
Woods seems to be good doc, gets high yield with fewer grafts but is so expensive,
about $14 per graft is his current price. Another thing about him is that he is a bit too conservative
when it comes to hairlines and he doesnt seem to give lot of density, all his cases have somewhat
thin see through look; yes he doesnt use too many grafts.I would need about 6 000 - 7000 grafts and
that would cost me almost 100 k, now you see thats a lot of money and im not sure if his work
justifies price, even if i get some discount it would still be lot of $$$
Umar on the other hand does bigger sessions 1500 grafts per day and charges $7 per graft, so it
would cost me 50K, without any discounts, mayb id be able to get it for cheaper price.
Thats half what Woods charges.
Umar densities are much better and has more documented cases on his website than woods
I never met Umar patient but Ive met one woods and while result was ok for amount of grafts used
the patient needed double the number of grafts to look good.
Woods does all his work by himself while Umar uses techs I think.
So apart from the obvious that Dr Umar is bang for buck, who in your opinion does better work,
gets better yield and looks more natural? Is Woods graft worthed 2 Umars, or its overpriced?
They both claim that 95% of grafts will grow.(dont know how they determine that)
Is it possible that Woods gets better yield due to his small sessions of 500 grafts per day vs Umars 1500 per day?
Btw im tossing between 2 coz im nw5/6 and will need to use bht/beard as i can only use abt 3 000-3500 head grafts according to Umar
I would like to hear your opinion, unbiased and honest
Cheers
I would need some help in chosing between these 2 doctors.
I did research on both of them and Im still not sure which one should I go for.
Im after these 2 docs bc I i will need to use body/beard hair for my procedure as my head donor
wont be enough to gimme coverage and density i desire, so you can see that limits my choices.
Woods seems to be good doc, gets high yield with fewer grafts but is so expensive,
about $14 per graft is his current price. Another thing about him is that he is a bit too conservative
when it comes to hairlines and he doesnt seem to give lot of density, all his cases have somewhat
thin see through look; yes he doesnt use too many grafts.I would need about 6 000 - 7000 grafts and
that would cost me almost 100 k, now you see thats a lot of money and im not sure if his work
justifies price, even if i get some discount it would still be lot of $$$
Umar on the other hand does bigger sessions 1500 grafts per day and charges $7 per graft, so it
would cost me 50K, without any discounts, mayb id be able to get it for cheaper price.
Thats half what Woods charges.
Umar densities are much better and has more documented cases on his website than woods
I never met Umar patient but Ive met one woods and while result was ok for amount of grafts used
the patient needed double the number of grafts to look good.
Woods does all his work by himself while Umar uses techs I think.
So apart from the obvious that Dr Umar is bang for buck, who in your opinion does better work,
gets better yield and looks more natural? Is Woods graft worthed 2 Umars, or its overpriced?
They both claim that 95% of grafts will grow.(dont know how they determine that)
Is it possible that Woods gets better yield due to his small sessions of 500 grafts per day vs Umars 1500 per day?
Btw im tossing between 2 coz im nw5/6 and will need to use bht/beard as i can only use abt 3 000-3500 head grafts according to Umar
I would like to hear your opinion, unbiased and honest
Cheers
Comment